Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 29;10(4):e0004632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004632

Table 3. Model fit and comparison statistics.

Model D¯ pD DIC
Partial
(1a) 1320 81 1401
(1b) 1345 114 1459
Covariate£
(2) 952 32 984

D¯ = posterior mean deviance, calculated as D¯=Ε[D]. where D = −2log p(y|θ).

pD = Posterior mean deviance—deviance of posterior means, calculated as pD = Eθ|y [D]−D(Eθ|y[θ]).

DIC = Deviance information criterion, analogous to the frequentist AIC estimate and estimated as DIC =D(θ¯)+2pD.

£Several covariate models (which also included random effect terms) were fitted starting with a model that included all covariates that were screened in the univariate procedure with a liberal p ≤ 0.2, followed by the removal of one covariate at a time from the Bayesian hierarchical models. The removal of % grassland area, minimum land surface temperature and an interaction term, ‘diurnal temperature range x % mixed forest area’ one at a time, in that order resulted in models with DIC values of 1261, 1014, and 1008. To the final covariate model, a random effect space-time term, Ψij was inserted, which resulted in a DIC value of 1023, indicating poor performance. Other previously removed covariates did not re-enter the final covariate model.