Table 3.
Correlation between C-RDS, Secondary Task, and DWI in three waves
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wave 1 | |||||||||
| 1 DWI | - | 0.42*** | 0.23*** | 0.31*** | 0.22*** | 0.18*** | 0.22*** | 0.20*** | 0.21*** |
| 2 C-RDS | - | 0.72*** | 0.19*** | 0.50*** | 0.47*** | 0.26*** | 0.45*** | 0.40*** | |
| 3 S-Task | - | 0.15*** | 0.41*** | 0.48*** | 0.20*** | 0.35*** | 0.43*** | ||
| Wave 2 | |||||||||
| 4 DWI | - | 0.50*** | 0.28*** | 0.39*** | 0.29*** | 0.18*** | |||
| 5 C-RDS | - | 0.68*** | 0.31*** | 0.53*** | 0.45*** | ||||
| 6 S-Task | - | 0.16*** | 0.40*** | 0.55*** | |||||
| Wave 3 | |||||||||
| 7 DWI | - | 0.47*** | 0.28*** | ||||||
| 8 C-RDS | - | 0.67*** | |||||||
| 9 S-Task | - | ||||||||
Note. Correlation was calculated using Pearson’s correlation between two continuous variables, and one continuous and one dichotomous variable, and Spearman correlation between two dichotomous variables.