Table 4.
Host | Location | Samples | ToxoDB PCR-RFLP genotypes | Reference | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#10 | #1 | #2 | #3 | #9 | # 17 | # 20 | # 204 | # 205 | # 213 | # 225 | |||||
Type I | Type II | Type III | Type II-variant | Chinese 1 | Chinese 2 | ||||||||||
Cat | BGAGHYSHZa | 109e | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 92 | 2i | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | [8–12, 21–24] | ||
Pig | GHQNGYAGJSCHHJLb | 71 | 15 | 1f | 2 | 51 | 2 | [8, 11–16, 33]; this study | |||||||
Sheep | Qinghai | 1 | 1 | [11] | |||||||||||
Goat | Yunnan | 8 | 7 | 1 | [25] | ||||||||||
Rabbit | Shanghai | 1 | 1 | [31] | |||||||||||
Wild bird | Xinjiang | 3 | 1 | 2 | [28] | ||||||||||
Pet bird | Gansu | 4 | 4 | [29] | |||||||||||
Chicken | Anhui | 1 | 1 | [12] | |||||||||||
Sparrow | Gansu | 4g | 3 | [30] | |||||||||||
Voles | Hubei | 1 | 1 | [12] | |||||||||||
Bats | JGJc | 8 | 3 | 5 | [4] | ||||||||||
Rat/mouse | Jiangsu | 7 | 7 | [26] | |||||||||||
Dog | Henan | 1h | [32] | ||||||||||||
Human | AGZSd | 16 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 1 | [10, 11, 27] | ||||||||
Total | 235 | 29 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 169 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
aBGAGSHYS, Beijing, Guangdong, Anhui, Guizhou, Hubei, Yunnan, Shanxi, Henan, Zhejiang
bGHQNGYAGJSCHHJL, Guangdong, Hunan, Qinghai, Nanjing, Gansu, Yunnan, Anhui, Guizhou, Jiangxi, Sichuan, Chongqing, Hubei, Henan, Jilin, Liaoning
cJGJ, Jilin, Guangdong, Jiangxi
dAGZS, Anhui, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Shanghai
eTwo of 109 samples was identified as a new genotype and not listed in Table 4
fTgPigCn14-56 had type II alleles at all markers except a allele not identified at the Apico locus and are considered the ToxoDB #1 or #3 in this study
gOne of four was identified as a new genotype and not listed in Table 4
hThis genotype was identified as a new genotype and not listed in Table 4
iGenotype Chinese 2 was identified in two cats in this study [9]