Table 3.

TSOS implementation assessments and corresponding RE-AIM framework domains

Assessment	Patient, provider or site assessment	How assessed	N	RE-AIM domain, level
Characteristics of 24 study sites versus all other US sites [35]	Site recruitment	CONSORT	24/224	Adoption, site
Organizational change, climate and culture surveys [95–102]	Trauma center providers	Web-based survey	10*24	Implementation, provider
Weekly recruitment log activity [16, 25, 70]	PTSD interventionist	Recruiting logs	24	Implementation, provider and site
Clinical notes in decision support tool [16]	PTSD interventionist	Decision support tool	24	Implementation, provider
Patient flow through protocol utilizing trauma registry, recruitment data [16, 25, 70]	Patient flow	CONSORT	960	Reach, patient
PTSD and comorbidity, gender and ethnicity groups [16, 25, 70]	Patient outcomes	Telephone interview	960	Effectiveness, patient
EHR, trauma registry, self-report logs [16, 25, 70]	Patient outcomes	Multiple sources	960	Implementation, patient
>6 months follow-up after intervention [16, 25, 70]	Patient 12-month follow-up	Phone	960	Maintenance, patient
Semi-structured key informant interviews [121–125]	PTSD interventionist	Phone	24	Implementation and maintenance, provider and site
National trauma center questionnaire [26, 30]	All US level I centers	Web	224	Maintenance, site

RE-AIM reach effectiveness adoption implementation maintenance, EHR electronic health record