Table 1.
TIMP-1 level (ng/ml) | p value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Mean | SD | Rang | |||
All study subjects | 81 | 211.2317 | 82.4088 | 40.1078–414.3112 | ||
Diagnostic category | <0.001 | |||||
Benign | 22 | 159.8383 | 58.3779 | 40.1078–239.5306 | ||
Malignant | 59 | 230.3953 | 82.2059 | 73.2381–414.3112 | ||
Age | 0.985 | |||||
<50 | 22 | 230.1297 | 79.5451 | 78.9473–378.5845 | ||
≧50 | 37 | 230.5533 | 84.8323 | 73.2381–414.3113 | ||
T status | 0.386 | |||||
≦2 | 24 | 215.8122 | 86.4862 | 73.2381–414.3113 | ||
>2 | 23 | 238.4916 | 90.9452 | 86.1807–404.1802 | ||
Lymph node | 0.798 | |||||
0 | 30 | 221.8737 | 89.6307 | 73.2381–414.3113 | ||
≧1 | 19 | 228.2739 | 76.2754 | 86.1807–324.1554 | ||
ER | 0.002 | |||||
Negative | 24 | 268.9795 | 82.9122 | 73.2381–324.1554 | ||
Positive | 35 | 203.9396 | 71.4596 | 86.1807–414.3113 | ||
PR | 0.030 | |||||
Negative | 34 | 250.1643 | 83.3048 | 73.2381–324.1554 | ||
Positive | 25 | 203.5096 | 74.0452 | 75.7956–414.3113 | ||
HER2+ | 0.120 | |||||
Negative | 38 | 242.7811 | 70.3116 | 86.1807–404.1802 | ||
Positive | 21 | 207.971 | 98.1427 | 73.2381–414.3113 | ||
Ki-67(%) | 0.597 | |||||
<15 % | 20 | 238.4001 | 62.2747 | 142.3562–378.5845 | ||
≧15 % | 39 | 226.2903 | 91.2385 | 73.2381–414.3113 | ||
Molecular subtype | ||||||
Luminal-A | 25 | 230.8728 | 58.3779 | 134.5391–324.1554 | <0.001 | |
Luminal-B | 10 | 136.6069 | 61.2456 | 73.2381–250.8275 | 0.327 | |
HER2+ | 11 | 272.8475 | 78.5198 | 126.9324–414.3113 | <0.001 | |
TNBC | 13 | 280.6168 | 74.7404 | 143.2887–404.1802 | <0.001 |
Serum was collected from 81 patients before surgery, including 22 benign and 59 malignant. Serum TIMP-1 level was detected by ELISA. Before detection, the serum samples were diluted 1:50 with 1 % BSA. ELISA was done according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Student’s T test was used to assess whether the mean of different group has statistically difference