Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;49(7):613–619. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000207

Table 4.

Multivariate models predictive of death in A) compensated cirrhosis, B) decompensated cirrhosis

Table 4A
Compensated (n=122) 24 deaths

variables HR (95% CI) −2LL

NULL MODEL --- 211.614

Age 1.08 (1.04-1.13) 180.674
MELD ---
Albumin 0.22 (0.11-0.41)

Age 1.09 (1.04-1.13) 184.317
Child-Pugh score 1.47 (1.14-1.89)
Platelet count 0.99 (0.98-1)

Age 1.1 (1.05-1.15) 174.894
Albumin 0.22 (0.11-0.44)
Platelet count 0.99 (0.98-1)

Age 1.09 (1.04-1.13) 177.340
Albumin 0.26 (0.13-0.53)
Bilirubin 1.3 (1.01-1.69)
Table 4B.
Decompensated (n=120) 35 deaths

variables HR (95% CI) −2LL

NULL MODEL --- 303.923

Creatinine 1.34 (1.12-1.60) 259.745
Child-Pugh Score 1.50 (1.27-1.78)
AST 1.01 (1.00-1.01)

Creatinine 2.12 (1.51-2.97) 241.702
Child-Pugh Score 1.33 (1.12-1.59)
platetet count 0.99 (0.98-1)

MELD 1.11 (1.07-1.14) 261.074
albumin 0.51 (0.34-0.77)
AST -NP

MELD 1.12 (1.08-1.17) 238.292
Albumin 0.547 (0.36-0.82)
Platelet count 0.99 (0.98-1)

Creatinine 1.28 (1.1-1.48) 281.753
INR 1.74 (1.36-2.23)
Bilirubin -NP

Creatinine 1.37 (1.17-1.61) 273.624
INR 1.45 (1.09-1.93)
albumin 0.49 (0.3-0.79)

The best model is shown in italic. When comparing 2 models with the same number of variables, the lower −2LL the better the model in explaining the outcome (in this case, death). NP=not independently predictive of death (and therefore not included in the model)