Table 3.
Hierarchical regression analysis examining gender and sexual orientation as moderators of incivility and job satisfaction.
| Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
Model 4 |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | B | SE | β | B | SE | β | B | SE | β | B | SE | β |
| Organizational tenure | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | –0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | –0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | –0.01 |
| Years teaching | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Department size | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Age | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.01 | –0.02 | 0.00 | 0.01 | –0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | –0.01 |
| Workplace incivility | –1.07 | 0.06 | –0.46*** | –1.18 | 0.11 | –0.52*** | –1.22 | 0.11 | –0.53*** | |||
| Gender | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.08** | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.06 | |||
| Sexual orientation | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.06* | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.04 | |||
| Incivility × Gender | 0.40 | 0.13 | 0.12** | 0.53 | 0.20 | 0.16** | ||||||
| Incivility × Orientation | –0.10 | 0.09 | –0.04 | –0.05 | 0.11 | –0.02 | ||||||
| Gender × Orientation | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.03 | ||||||
| Incivility × Gender × Orientation | –0.16 | 0.20 | –0.05 | |||||||||
| R2 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.25 | ||||||||
| F for change in R2 | 2.70∗ | 110.30∗∗∗ | 3.90∗ | 1.63 | ||||||||
∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.