Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 3;29(5):674–680. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0165

Table 3.

The effects of basal diet and naturally mycotoxin-contaminated diets with or without yeast cell wall adsorbent, on growth performance of broiler chickens (n = 5)

Item Control1 NCD1 NCDD1 SEM p-value
BW (g)
 0 d 50.34 52.03 52.55 2.06 0.735
 21 d 798.99a 740.83c 772.85b 7.345 <0.001
 42 d 2,296.50a 2,117.59b 2,184.47ab 42.868 0.036
ADG (g/d)
 0 to 21 d 35.65a 32.80c 34.30b 0.433 0.002
 22 to 42 d 71.30a 65.56b 67.23b 1.046 0.006
 0 to 42 d 53.48a 49.18c 50.76b 0.413 0.001
ADFI (g/d)
 0 to 21 d 47.72 46.6 47.23 0.502 0.324
 22 to 42 d 133.6 133.52 134.58 0.787 0.588
 0 to 42 d 90.66 90.06 90.90 0.540 0.543
FCR
 0 to 21 d 1.34b 1.42a 1.38ab 0.023 0.075
 22 to 42 d 1.88b 2.04a 2.00a 0.026 0.003
 0 to 42 d 1.70b 1.83a 1.79a 0.015 <0.001
Mortality (%)
 0 to 42 d 1.00b 6.00a 1.00b 1.350 0.034

SEM, standard error of the mean; BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; FCR, g of feed/g of gain.

1

Control, basal diet; NCD, naturally contaminated diet; NCDD, NCD+0.2% yeast cell wall adsorbent.

a,b

Means within a row with different letters differ significantly at p<0.05.