Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 21;8(2):116–124. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.2.116

Table 5. Comparison of peri-implant stain between groups and between sites of strain gauges during unilateral load application.

Group RD
(right distal)
RM
(right mesial)
LM
(left mesial)
LD
(left distal)
2-way ANOVA
(X ± SD)
I 98.00 ± 5.70A,a -313.00 ± 8.36A,b -119.00 ± 6.51A,c 91.00 ± 4.18A,a .00*
II 653.00 ± 42.66B,a -936.00 ± 39.11B,b -487.00 ± 5.70B,c 259.00 ± 6.51B,d .00*
III 714.00 ± 23.02C,a -1220.00 ± 75.82C,b -485.00 ± 3.53C,c 354.60 ± 13.53C,d .00*
IV 792.00 ± 4.47D,a -1872.00 ± 25.64D,b -596.00 ± 41.59D,c 406.00 ± 5.47D,d .00*
IVred 93.00 ± 4.47A,a -306.00 ± 8.94A,b -103.00 ± 2.74A,c 89.00 ± 2.23A,d .00*
2-way ANOVA (P) .00* .00* .00* .00*

X; mean, SD; standard deviation, LSD; least significant differences. The different upper case letters indicate significant differences between groups (Bonferroni, P < .05). The different lower case letters indicate significant differences between sites of strain gauges (Bonferroni, P < .05). *P is significant at 5% level of significance.