Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson. 2006 Sep 1;183(1):102–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.08.002

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Signal-to-noise data of 10 mM sucrose, 3 mm NMR tube as a function of the NaCl concentration. S/N analysis of 1D 1H spectra (left ordinate, ●) and HSQC trace (right ordinate, ■) for the anomeric proton (0.5 ppm noise region). The solid line depicts the predicted salt dependence for the 1D data based on Eq. (1). S/N=1crS4[NaCl]+RC(TC+TA)/f where [NaCl] is the salt concentration [M] and f is a proportionality constant. The sample resistance is expressed as cr4[NaCl]. c incorporates several constants and rS4 is the sample radius [mm]. The following values were obtained for the radical: 6.41×107rS4[NaCl]+7.43×107. If no salt is present the S/N is primarily determined by the second term in Eq. (1), while at 2 M NaCl it is assumed that the first term dominates, therefore the S/N curve may be approximated as k*[NaCl]−0.5 where k = 792, for 3 mm tubes (dotted line). This fit provides a simple estimation of the S/N dependency at high salt concentrations. In either case, the conductivity is assumed to be proportional to the salt concentration which for high salt solutions is no longer accurate.