Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2014 Feb 21;33(2):289–297. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2014.880944

Table 2.

Compiled NMR and PSEUROT 6.2 Data. Exp. And Lit. refer to experimentally determined values and literature references, respectively.

H OH OCH3 F* SCH3 SeCH3

Exp. Lit. a Exp. Lit. a Exp. Lit. b Exp. Lit. a,c Exp. Lit. d,e Exp.

J 1’-2’ 7.2 6.3 4.5 4.8 3.9 4.0 1.4 1.5 8.3 8.5 8.7
J 1’-2” 6.1 6.4 19.7 19.7
J 2’-3’ 6.9 6.3 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.0 5.1 5.8 5.5 5.7
J 2”-3’ 3.9 4.3 21.5 21.6
J 3’-4’ 3.9 4.0 5.5 5.4 5.7 5.9 8.6 8.7 2.8 2.0 2.9

Exp. Lit.a Exp. Lit.a Exp. Lit.b Exp. Lit. a Exp. Lit.e Exp.

I.
North
P 18.0 18.0 32.4 16.0 12.5 11.0 28.6 21.0 −22.5 - −13.3
ΦM 38.0 - 32.0 35.0 32.0 35.0 32.0 41 32.0 - 32.0
II.
South
P 141.5 162.0 156.6 167.0 144.7 171.0 38.6 159.0 138.7 - 137.6
ΦM 32.3 - 35.0 38.0 35.0 37.0 35.0 41 35.0 - 35.0
%S 67 60 40 47 38 40 32 13 81 76 84
*

The J1’-2’’ and J2’’-3’ values in this column designate H1’-F2’ and H3’-F2’ coupling, respectively.

These values do not represent a %S conformer, rather a percent of a second starting northern conformer. Neither Pseurot nor the Matlab script were able to fit the data of 4 to both northern and southern conformations; despite varying input conditions, the programs consistently returned two northern conformers.

Table references: