Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar;51(3):213–222. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.4.11

Table 4. .

Backward Stepwise Discriminant Modela

Step
Included Variable
Fisher Function Coefficient
r2
% of Correct Prediction
Wilks λb
P Value
Index Ankle-Sprain Group
Control Group
λ
df 1c
df 2d
1 Response to inversion perturbation 3.67 19.2 74 73 0.817 6 98 .004
Eversion peak power (30°/s) 4.76
Dorsiflexion range of motion 5.90
Timed stair test 8.00
No. of foot lifts during single-legged stance with eyes closed 8.74
Star Excursion Balance Test 9.82
2 Eversion peak power (30°/s) 4.76 18.4 70 76 0.824 5 98 .002
Dorsiflexion range of motion 5.90
Timed stair test 8.00
No. of foot lifts during single-legged stance with eyes closed 8.74
Star Excursion Balance Test 9.82
3 Dorsiflexion range of motion 5.90 17.7 73 73 0.832 4 98 .001
Timed stair test 8.00
No. of foot lifts during single-legged stance with eyes closed 8.74
Star Excursion Balance Test 9.82
4 Timed stair test 8.00 16.9 70 68 0.840 3 98 .001
No. of foot lifts during single-legged stance with eyes closed 8.74
Star Excursion Balance Test 9.82
5 No. of foot lifts during single-legged stance with eyes closed 8.74 15.2 63 69 0.855 2 98 .001
Star Excursion Balance Test 9.82

Abbreviation: df, degrees of freedom.

a 

At each step, the variable with the lowest Fisher function coefficient and highest Wilks λ was excluded from the model.

b 

Wilks λ indicates the significance of the discriminant model. The 2 predictors that add discriminative power to the discriminant model are different at P = .01.

c 

The effect degrees of freedom for the given function are based on the number of groups present in the categorical variable and the number of continuous discriminant variables.

d 

The error degrees of freedom for the given function are based on the number of groups present in the categorical variable, the number of continuous discriminant variables, and the number of observations in the analysis.