Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon). 2015 Sep 14;2(4):174–185. doi: 10.1080/2326263X.2015.1080961

Table 1.

Additional measures of performance for the analysis of cursor control

Performance Measure untuned units tuned units
E H E H
Path Efficiency [%] 34 ± 13 36 ± 15 41 ± 12 35 ± 15* (a)
Parallel Direction Change 41.4 ± 48.1 29.1 ± 25.5 32.5 ± 30.1 37.2 ± 39.9
Orthogonal Direction Change 39.2 ± 48.5 28.71 ± 29.7 29.6 ± 31.5 31.9 ± 34.3
Movement Variability [%] 7.4 ± 4 6.2 ± 2 6.9 ± 4 6.4 ± 3
Movement Error [%] 9.5 ± 4 8.9 ± 4 8.6 ± 3 8.1 ± 4
Movement Offset [%] 5 ± 5 5 ± 3 4.4 ± 4 5.8 ± 5* (b)
Target Re-entry 1.14 ± 1.1 0.94 ± 1.0 0.72 ± 0.91 0.65 ± 0.47
1.04 ± 1.05 0.68 ± 0.72* (b)

Note: Values are mean ± SD; E, easy diagonal; H, hard diagonal;

*

p < .05 via Student's t-test or Wilcoxon ranksum when data were nonparametric: (a)– ttest; (b) - ranksum.