Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 26;8:73–89. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S103330

Table 3.

Comparison of strategies in the psychology domain

Subgroup descriptors Summary-score strategy Single-item strategy
Variables, n 8 26
Identified subgroups, n 6 8
Subgroup-size range, n (%) 33–336 (4%–36%) 48–199 (5%–21%)
Posterior probability, median (interquartile range) 0.95 (0.82–0.99) 0.97 (0.88–1)
Subjects with posterior probability above 0.33 for more than one subgroup, n (%) 93 (10%) 59 (6%) +3 (<1%) with no posterior probability >0.33
Subgroups’ median posterior probability, mean (range) 0.91 (0.83–1.00) 0.97 (0.95–0.99)
Subjects with posterior probability less than 0.7 on average per subgroup, n (%),range 144 (18%) 6–43 (4%–27%) 12 (11%) 4–20 (7%–19%)
Identified features*, n 5 6
Crossing subgroups#, % (n) 80 (12 of 15) 86 (24 of 28)

Notes:

*

Distinct characteristic defined by a single variable or a group of variables;

#

count of subgroups that crossed in the profile plots (subgroup-by-subgroup matrix).