Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 26;8:73–89. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S103330

Table 4.

Comparison of strategies in the pain domain

Subgroup descriptors Summary-score strategy Single-item strategy
Variables, n 9 14
Identified subgroups, n 6 7
Subgroup size range, n (%) 48–281 (5%–30%) 42–252 (5%–27%)
Posterior probability, median (interquartile range) 0.96 (0.75–0.98) 0.97 (0.83–0.99)
Subjects with posterior probability above 0.33 for more than one subgroup, n (%) 137 (15%) 65 (7%) +2 (<1%) with no posterior probability >0.33
Subgroups’ median posterior probability, mean (range) 0.94 (0.90–0.97) 0.97 (0.93–0.99)
Subjects with posterior probability less than 0.7 on average per subgroup, n (%),range 35 (17%) 3–119 (6%–41%) 18 (14%) 5–38 (10%–15%)
Identified features*, n 5 5
Crossing subgroups#, % (n) 93 (14 of 15) 90 (19 of 21)

Notes:

*

Distinct characteristic defined by a single variable or a group of variables;

#

count of subgroups that crossed in the profile plots (subgroup-by-subgroup matrix).