Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 28;9:2547–2555. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S103481

Table 3.

Subgoup analysis

Subgroup I2 (%) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Origin of population
 White patients 77.6 <0.01 0.76 (0.63–0.92)a 0.04
 Asian patients 42.1 0.08 0.67 (0.58–0.77)b <0.01
Tumor type
 Digestive system cancers 9.9 0.35 0.70 (0.59–0.83)b <0.01
 Respiratory system cancers 82.2 <0.01 0.71 (0.59–0.85)a <0.01
Source of RNA
 Tissue 60.3 0.02 0.68 (0.60–0.76)a <0.01
 Blood 60.9 0.08 1.25 (0.76–2.04)b 0.38
miR-126 assay
 ISH 25.9 0.26 0.75 (0.53–1.05)b 0.10
 qRT-PCR 68.0 <0.01 0.7 (0.61–0.79)a <0.01
HR
 Report 63.2 0.02 0.69 (0.61–0.79)a <0.01
 DE 70.0 0.01 0.75 (0.54–1.05)a 0.10
Cutoff
 Median 70.4 <0.01 0.70 (0.62–0.80)a <0.01
 Others 0 0.42 0.69 (0.54–0.88)b <0.01
Multivariate analysis
 Yes 42.9 0.08 0.72 (0.63–0.83)b <0.01
 No 75.8 <0.01 0.66 (0.54–0.81)a <0.01

Notes:

a

Random-effects model.

b

Fixed-effects model. P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; miR-126, microRNA-126; ISH, in situ hybridization; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; DE, data extrapolated; CI, confidence interval.