Table 4.

Final cross-level ecological model of correlates of dog walking (any vs. none) among adolescents who own a dog (N=484) in the Seattle and Baltimore regions. Significant (p<.10) interactions are shown in Figure 1: A–E.

	Walk at all (≥1 day/week) vs. none (n=484)
	OR	95% CI	p
Intercept (with centered variables):	1.89	1.25, 2.87	--
Final Ecological Model
Adolescent Age	0.89	0.77, 1.03	.112
Adolescent Gender (Male)	1.03	0.69, 1.54	.892
Adolescent White Non-Hispanic	1.03	0.64, 1.63	.916
Parent married/living with a partner	0.88	0.48, 1.60	.668
Parent with college degree	1.25	0.76, 2.06	.385
House type (single family)	0.72	0.31, 1.68	.916
Portable electronics ownership index	1.24	0.84, 1.82	.278
Perceived aesthetics (Parents NEWS)	1.20	0.83, 1.73	.326
Walkability Index	1.12	1.03, 1.21	.006
Age*Perceived Aesthetics	0.74	0.59, 0.92	.007
Race*Perceived Aesthetics	1.88	0.91, 3.87	.090
Age*Portable electronics ownership	0.85	0.72, 1.01	.062
Parent with college degree*Portable electronics ownership	0.29	0.15, 0.55	<.001
House type*Portable electronics ownership	2.64	1.10, 6.31	.029