Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2015 Nov 19;82:65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.011

Table 5.

Final cross-level ecological model of correlates of dog walking frequency among adolescents who reported walking the dog at least 1 day/week (N=300) in the Seattle and Baltimore regions. Significant (p<.10) interactions are shown in Figure 2.

Number of days/week walking dog (1–7)
(n=300)
β B 95% CI p
Intercept (with centered variables): 2.94 3.48 3.07, 3.90 --
Final Ecological Model
 Adolescent Age (years) −0.13 −0.09 −0.25, 0.07 .273
 Adolescent Gender (Male) 0.02 0.03 −0.39, 0.46 .879
 Adolescent White Non-Hispanic −0.11 −0.25 −0.76, 0.25 .325
 Parent married/living with a partner (marital status) −0.15 −0.42 −1.03, 1.26 .177
 Parent with college degree 0.32 0.74 0.22, 1.26 .006
 Housing type (single family) −0.36 −1.30 −2.13, −0.48 .002
 Traffic Safety (adolescent NEWS) −0.22 −0.36 −0.71, 0 .048
 Street Connectivity [intersections/sq km] 0.32 0.02 0.01, 0.04 .006
 Mixed Use [0=single 1=mixed] −0.33 −1.45 −2.44, −0.46 .004
 Marital status*street connectivity −0.24 −0.03 −0.06, 0 .083

B denotes unstandardized regression coefficient

β denotes standardized Beta