Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Nov 2;111(5):745–765. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000075

Table 3.

Effects of the UV Intervention, URM Status, and FG Status on Biology Course Grade

HLM Regression


γ F (df) p β t (df) p
UV Intervention 0.06 4.74 (1, 1027) .030 0.08 2.26 (1028) .024
URM −0.14 25.54 (1, 1025) .000 −0.13 5.05 (1028) .000
FG −0.02 0.82 (1, 1025) .364 −0.03 0.85 (1028) .393
URM x FG 0.00 0.01 (1, 1024) .911 0.00 0.06 (1028) .950
UV x URM 0.04 2.75 (1, 1023) .097 0.06 1.69 (1028) .092
UV x FG 0.01 0.11 (1, 1026) .737 0.01 0.24 (1028) .808
UV x URM x FG 0.07 6.33 (1, 1023) .012 0.08 2.45 (1028) .015
Confidence about Performance 0.12 36.95 (1, 1025) .000 0.15 6.16 (1028) .000
Prior GPA 0.44 456.36 (1, 1025) .000 0.55 21.32 (1028) .000
UV x Confidence 0.02 1.46 (1, 1024) .227 0.03 1.27 (1028) .203
UV x Prior GPA −0.04 4.12 (1, 1026) .043 −0.05 2.01 (1028) .045

Note. UV = Utility Value intervention condition (UV = +1, Control = −1), URM = Underrepresented Minority (URM = +1, Majority = −1), FG = First-generation (FG = +1, Continuing-generation = −1).