Table 3.
HLM | Regression | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
γ | F (df) | p | β | t (df) | p | |
UV Intervention | 0.06 | 4.74 (1, 1027) | .030 | 0.08 | 2.26 (1028) | .024 |
URM | −0.14 | 25.54 (1, 1025) | .000 | −0.13 | 5.05 (1028) | .000 |
FG | −0.02 | 0.82 (1, 1025) | .364 | −0.03 | 0.85 (1028) | .393 |
URM x FG | 0.00 | 0.01 (1, 1024) | .911 | 0.00 | 0.06 (1028) | .950 |
UV x URM | 0.04 | 2.75 (1, 1023) | .097 | 0.06 | 1.69 (1028) | .092 |
UV x FG | 0.01 | 0.11 (1, 1026) | .737 | 0.01 | 0.24 (1028) | .808 |
UV x URM x FG | 0.07 | 6.33 (1, 1023) | .012 | 0.08 | 2.45 (1028) | .015 |
Confidence about Performance | 0.12 | 36.95 (1, 1025) | .000 | 0.15 | 6.16 (1028) | .000 |
Prior GPA | 0.44 | 456.36 (1, 1025) | .000 | 0.55 | 21.32 (1028) | .000 |
UV x Confidence | 0.02 | 1.46 (1, 1024) | .227 | 0.03 | 1.27 (1028) | .203 |
UV x Prior GPA | −0.04 | 4.12 (1, 1026) | .043 | −0.05 | 2.01 (1028) | .045 |
Note. UV = Utility Value intervention condition (UV = +1, Control = −1), URM = Underrepresented Minority (URM = +1, Majority = −1), FG = First-generation (FG = +1, Continuing-generation = −1).