Table 6.
Effects of the VA Intervention, the UV Intervention, URM Status, and FG Status on Biology Course Grade
HLM | Regression | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
γ | F (df) | p | β | t (df) | p | |
UV Intervention | 0.06 | 4.52 (1, 1017) | .034 | 0.07 | 2.21 (1018) | .027 |
URM | −0.14 | 24.81 (1, 1016) | .000 | −0.13 | 4.98 (1018) | .000 |
FG | −0.03 | 0.89 (1, 1015) | .346 | −0.03 | 0.89 (1018) | .375 |
URM x FG | 0.00 | 0.01 (1, 1015) | .943 | 0.00 | 0.02 (1018) | .983 |
UV x URM | 0.04 | 2.56 (1, 1013) | .110 | 0.06 | 1.63 (1018) | .103 |
UV x FG | 0.01 | 0.13 (1, 1016) | .715 | 0.01 | 0.28 (1018) | .778 |
UV x URM x FG | 0.07 | 6.52 (1, 1013) | .011 | 0.08 | 2.49 (1018) | .013 |
Confidence about Performance | 0.12 | 36.86 (1, 1015) | .000 | 0.16 | 6.16 (1018) | .000 |
Prior GPA | 0.44 | 452.68 (1, 1015) | .000 | 0.55 | 21.25 (1018) | .000 |
UV x Confidence | 0.02 | 1.17 (1, 1014) | .280 | 0.03 | 1.15 (1018) | .252 |
UV x Prior GPA | −0.04 | 4.03 (1, 1017) | .045 | −0.05 | 1.99 (1018) | .047 |
VA Intervention | −0.01 | 0.07 (1, 1013) | .788 | −0.01 | 0.25 (1018) | .801 |
VA x URM | −0.02 | 0.36 (1, 1015) | .551 | −0.02 | 0.61 (1018) | .539 |
VA x FG | −0.05 | 2.93 (1, 1013) | .087 | −0.06 | 1.89 (1018) | .072 |
VA x URM x FG | −0.04 | 2.37 (1, 1015) | .124 | −0.05 | 1.58 (1018) | .115 |
UV x VA | −0.00 | 0.00 (1, 1014) | .949 | −0.00 | 0.04 (1018) | .969 |
UV x VA x URM | 0.02 | 0.44 (1, 1014) | .506 | 0.02 | 0.68 (1018) | .498 |
UV x VA x FG | 0.04 | 2.52 (1, 1014) | .113 | 0.06 | 1.67 (1018) | .096 |
UV x VA x URM x FG | 0.01 | 0.06 (1, 1016) | .808 | 0.01 | 0.29 (1018) | .772 |
VA x Confidence | 0.01 | 0.31 (1, 1014) | .577 | 0.01 | 0.54 (1018) | .592 |
VA x Prior GPA | −0.00 | 0.00 (1, 1016) | .950 | −0.00 | 0.12 (1018) | .907 |
Note. UV = Utility Value intervention condition (UV = +1, Control = −1), URM = Underrepresented Minority (URM = +1, Majority = −1), FG = First-generation (FG = +1, Continuing-generation = −1). VA = Values Affirmation (VA = +1, Control = −1).