Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2016 Mar 17;42(2):239–252. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2016.01.005

Table 4.

Reliability and Validity of the KOOS function, recreation and sport scale and KOOS-PS Short Form

Study N Population description Internal consistency: Cronbach’s alpha Test-retest reliability: ICC Comparator Correlation
KOOS function, recreation and sport scale
Xie et al 200622 127 People from Singapore, China with knee OA scheduled for TKA > 0.7 0.7 SF-36 Physical Functioning r = 0.5
de Groot et al 200823 262 People from the Netherlands with knee OA or TKA > 0.9 > 0.5 SF-36 Physical Functioning r = 0.1–0.6
Ornetti et al 200825 67 People from France with knee OA or awaiting TKR 0.8 0.8 Osteoarthritis knee and hip quality of life questionnaire r = 0.3
Goncalves et al 200924 223 People from Portugal with symptomatic knee OA 0.9 0.9 SF-36 Physical Functioning r = 0.6
Paradowski et al 201548 68 People from Poland awaiting TKR 0.9 0.9 SF-36 Physical Functioning r = 0.4
KOOS-PS Short Form
Ornetti et al 200949 87 People from France with knee OA 0.9 Osteoarthritis knee and hip quality of life questionnaire r = −0.4
Goncalves et al 201026 85 People from Portugal with symptomatic knee OA 0.9 0.9
Davis et al 2009 248 People from Canada 6 months after TKR 0.9 WOMAC Physical Function r = 0.9
Gul et al 201350 People from Turkey with symptomatic knee OA 0.9 0.8 WOMAC Physical Function r = 0.8
Singh et al 201451 138 People from the US with knee OA 0.7