Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 12;31(6):997–1002. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.6.997

Table 3. Comparisons of two-finger chest compression techniques: index-middle vs. middle-ring fingers.

Parameters Right index-middle fingers
(n = 30)
(95% CI)
Right middle-ring fingers
(n = 30)
(95% CI)
95% CI of the difference P value
Lower limit Upper limit
Mean compression depth (mm) 39.0 ± 3.3
(37.8 to 40.2)
36.9 ± 4.5
(35.2 to 38.6)
NA NA 0.002*‡
Deep enough compressions (%) 78.5 ± 27.5
(68.3 to 88.8)
62.8 ± 36.4
(49.2 to 76.4)
NA NA 0.001*‡
Total compressions (No.) 169.6 ± 23.3
(160.9 to 178.3)
169.9 ± 26.3
(160.1 to 179.7)
-4.742 4.209 0.904
Compressions fully released (%) 82.2 ± 24.0
(73.2 to 91.1)
83.8 ± 27.1
(73.7 to 93.9)
NA NA 0.543*
Mean compression rate (/min) 119.9 ± 17.3
(113.5 to 126.4)
119.2 ± 19.0
(112.1 to 126.3)
-2.988 4.388 0.701
Hands-off time (sec) 34.9 ± 5.5
(32.8 to 36.9)
34.1 ± 5.6
(32.0 to 36.2)
-0.876 2.410 0.348
Total ventilations (No.) 10.2 ± 1.7
(9.6 to 10.9)
10.1 ± 1.6
(9.5 to 10.7)
NA NA 0.692*
Mean volume (mL) 66.6 ± 31.3
(54.9 to 78.3)
65.5 ± 36.9
(51.7 to 79.3)
NA NA 0.905*
Left index-middle fingers
(n = 30)
(95% CI)
Left middle-ring fingers
(n = 30)
(95% CI)
Mean compression depth (mm) 38.1 ± 3.1
(36.9 to 39.2)
36.8 ± 3.5
(35.5 to 38.1)
NA NA 0.003*‡
Deep enough compressions (%) 69.6 ± 32.1
(57.6 to 81.6)
56.3 ± 33.8
(43.7 to 68.9)
NA NA 0.008*‡
Total compressions (No.) 167.2 ± 23.0
(158.6 to 175.8)
166.0 ± 23.4
(157.3 to 174.8)
-1.567 3.900 0.390
Compressions fully released (%) 85.7 ± 19.3
(78.5 to 92.9)
79.0 ± 31.1
(67.4 to 90.6)
NA NA 0.281*
Mean compression rate (/min) 118.7 ± 17.2
(112.3 to 125.2)
117.9 ± 18.3
(111.0 to 124.7)
-1.762 3.496 0.505
Hands-off time (sec) 35.0 ± 5.2
(33.1 to 36.9)
33.9 ± 4.8
(32.1 to 35.7)
-0.181 2.448 0.088
Total ventilations (No.) 10.1 ± 1.6
(9.5 to 10.7)
9.6 ± 1.8
(8.9 to 10.3)
NA NA 0.227*
Mean volume (mL) 70.8 ± 42.0
(55.1 to 86.5)
71.4 ± 41.7
(55.8 to 86.9)
NA NA 0.649*

Data are presented as mean ± SD (95% CI).

N/A, not applicable.

*Statistical significances were tested by Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Statistical significances were tested by two-sided paired t-tests. Significant P value < 0.05.