Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015 Apr 15;37(4):402–413. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1023264

Table 5.

Hierarchical Linear Regressions Examining Changes in HOMA-IR Predicting Changes Cognitive Function from Baseline to 12 Months

B SE B β ΔR2 ΔF
Digit Span Forward (n = 79) .00 .01
  Age −.04 .03 −.140
  BL HOMA-IR <.001 .07 .006
  BL Digits Forward .37 .12 .335**
  12 Month HOMA-IR .03 .27 .013
Digit Span Backward (n = 78) .06 5.17*
  Age −.07 .03 −.227*
  BL HOMA-IR <.001 .07 −.007
  BL Digits Backward .31 .12 .292**
  12 Month HOMA-IR −.61 .27 −.253*
Switching of Attention-A (n = 75) .02 5.45*
  Age .05 .04 .080
  Education −.58 .29 −.132*
  BL HOMA-IR −.05 .08 −.047
  BL Switching A .76 .07 .743***
  12 Month HOMA-IR .74 .32 .162*
Switching of Attention-B (n = 77) .03 5.14*
  Age .08 .13 .054
  BL HOMA-IR −.48 .25 −.163
  BL Switching B .54 .07 .673***
  12 Month HOMA-IR 2.31 1.02 .195*
Stroop (n = 81) .001 .16
  Age −.09 .04 −.265*
  BL HOMA-IR −.05 .07 −.065
  BL Stroop .33 .09 .362**
  12 Month HOMA-IR −.11 .29 −.04
Memory (n = 80) .005 .79
  Age −.05 .03 −.165
  BL HOMA-IR .06 .05 .111
  BL Memory .63 .09 .660***
  12 Month HOMA-IR .17 .19 .075
Letters (n = 76) .002 .36
  Age −.04 .03 −.107
  Education .56 .20 .195**
  BL HOMA-IR −.01 .05 −.008
  BL Letters .75 .07 .760***
12 Month HOMA-IR .13 .21 .043
Animals .009 1.32
  Age −.05 .05 −.08
  BL HOMA-IR .09 .10 .08
  BL Animals .72 .09 .666***
  12 Month HOMA-IR .46 .40 .103

Note:

*

p< .05,

**

p<.01,

***

p<.001;

higher scores are better for all tests except SOA-A and SOA-B.

Abbreviations: BL = Baseline, HOMA-IR = homeostasis model of assessment for insulin resistance, Switching = Switching of Attention. These results represent the final model in which 12 month HOMA-IR is entered into the second block.