Skip to main content
. 2016 May 3;10:193. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00193

Table 2.

Performance comparison of the proposed method and ADJUST for identification of ocular artifact related ICs with manual detection.

Parameters/Methods Proposed ADJUST
True Positive (TP) 51 44
False Positive (FP) 10 13
True Negative (TN) 285 282
False Negative (FN) 6 13
Average Sensitivity 89.47% 77.19%
Average Specificity 96.61% 95.59%
Agreement Rate 95.45% 92.61%