Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;3(1):e000388. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000388

Table 2.

Summary of meta-regression of differences observed by each method

Mean difference compared to cardiac MR
Imaging modality Year published LVEDV (mL) (95% CI) Overall p value I2
p value
LVESV (mL) (95% CI) Overall p value I2
p value
LVEF (%) (95% CI) Overall p value I2
p value
2D-echocardiography
Volumes N=1579, LVEF N=1683
Overall −33.26 (−43.42 to −20.65) <0.0001 87% p<0.0001 −16.20 (−21.36 to −11.04) <0.0001 73% <0.0001 −0.66 (−2.14 to 0.82) 0.38 72% <0.0001
<2005 −23.23 (−43.86 to −2.59) 0.03 77% p<0.0001 −12.15 (−18.55 to --5.75) 0.0002 0% 0.05 −2.11 (−4.48 to 0.26) 0.08 3% 0.40
2005–2009 −33.49 (−46.88 to −20.09) <0.0001 90% p<0.0001 −17.73 (−25.11 to −10.36) <0.0001 81% <0.0001 −0.26 (−2.32 to 1.81) 0.81 81% <0.0001
>2009 −46.46 (−72.27 to −20.65) 0.0004 83% p<0.0001 −18.73 (−29.46 to −8.01) 0.0006 58% 0.05 −1.14 (−3.03 to 0.21) 0.09 0% 0.67
2D-echocardiography with contrast
Volumes and LVEF N=283
Overall* −18.05 (−6.39 to −9.7) <0.0001 0% p=0.45 −7.84 (−14.46 to −1.22) 0.02 0% p=0.99 −1.03 (−3.38 to 1.35) 0.39 0% p=0.61
3D-echocardiography
Volumes N=1159, LVEF N=1104
Overall −14.16 (−18.66 to −9.66) <0.0001 23% p=0.12 −6.49 (−9.91 to −3.07) 0.0002 0% p=0.96 0.13 (−0.91 to 1.16) 0.81 0% p=1.00
<2005 −15.14 (−25.17 to −5.12) 0.003 0% p=0.49 −6.38 (−13.36 to 0.60) 0.07 0% p=0.91 0.25 (−2.09 to 2.59) 0.83 0% p=1.00
2005–2009 −13.32 (−18.64 to −8.01) <0.0001 43% p=0.01 −6.27 (−10.41 to −2.13) 0.003 0% p=0.72 0.02 (−1.20 to 1.23) 0.98 0% p=0.99
>2009 −18.95 (−34.54 to −3.36) 0.02 0% p=0.86 −8.77 (−21.00 to 3.47) 0.16 0% p=0.84 0.89 (−2.93 to 4.70) 0.65 9% p=0.33
Multidetector CT
Volumes N=790, LVEF N=780
Overall −1.16 (−4.14 to 1.83) 0.45 0% p=0.90 −0.11 (−2.40 to 2.18) 0.93 0% p=0.96 0.86 (−0.21 to 1.94) 0.12 0% p=0.55
2007–2009 5.21 (−2.13 to 12.54) 0.16 0% p=0.74 2.59 (−1.19 to 6.36) 0.18 0% p=0.93 0.45 (−1.27 to 2.17) 0.51 0% p=0.94
>2009 −2.41 (−5.68 to 0.85) 0.15 0% p=0.99 −1.68 (−4.56 to 1.21) 0.25 0% p=0.97 1.13 (−0.25 to 2.50) 0.11 4% p=0.40

Values are mean (95% CI).

*Insufficient number of studies for subgroup analysis.

LVEDV, Left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume.