Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 28;10:691–701. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S103840

Table 1.

Threefold data collection

Data collection Participants (in total/3 units)
Demand: actual use of DASA instrument
Prior to the study
 Back-translation of instrument N/A
 Training of the nursing staff N/A
During the study
 Daily completion of DASA assessments N/A
After the study
 Information about patients’ treatment days during the study, and realized amount of assessments DASA assessments (treatment days), potential amount (n=1,116)
DASA assessments, realized amount (n=716)
Acceptability: patient recruitment ratio; limited efficacy: predictive validity
During the study
 Daily DASA assessments Risk assessments in total (n=178)
Patients with informed consent (n=12)
Acceptability: patients’ perceptions of strengths and weaknesses of DASA use
Meeting prior to the study
 Introduction of the DASA Patients (n=27)
 Procedure of instrument use during the study
 Preliminary perceptions of the DASA
Meeting during the study
 Strengths and weaknesses of DASA use Patients (n=26)
Meeting after the study
 Strengths and weaknesses of DASA use Patients (n=19)
Written feedback (n=5)

Abbreviations: DASA, Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression; N/A, not applicable.