Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;9:2495–2509. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S101800

Table 4.

Results of meta-analysis for diagnostic value of FNA cytology, BRAFV600E-mutation analysis, and the combined strategy in all FNA specimens

Parameter FNA
BRAF
FNA + BRAF
Result 95% CI Heterogeneity, I2 Result 95% CI Heterogeneity, I2 Result 95% CI Heterogeneity, I2
Pooled sensitivity 0.814 0.803–0.824 93.5% 0.619 0.605–0.633 93% 0.874 0.865–0.884 92.5%
Pooled specificity 0.981 0.978–0.985 86.4% 0.997 0.995–0.998 14.1% 0.968 0.963–0.972 92.5%
Pooled LR, + 23.868 14.139–40.293 87.7% 34.982 23.801–51.415 19.5% 22.353 13.027–38.355 93.1%
Pooled LR, − 0.216 0.172–0.273 94.2% 0.433 0.384–0.489 91.8% 0.146 0.111–0.192 93%
Pooled DOR SROC 127.73 75.082–217.28 76.1% 96.570 63.932–145.87 21.4% 187.92 110.24–320.35 76.4%
AUC 0.9551 0.9207 0.9744
Q* 0.8975 0.8542 0.9271

Note:

*

The Q index indicates the point at which sensitivity is equal to specificity.

Abbreviations: FNA, fine-needle aspiration; CI, confidence interval; LR, likelihood ratio; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; SROC, summary receiver-operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve.