Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;9:2495–2509. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S101800

Table 6.

Results of meta-analysis for diagnostic value of BRAFV600E mutation in indeterminate cases

Parameter Indeterminate
SMC
AUS/FLUS
FN/SFN
Result 95% CI Heterogeneity, I2 Result 95% CI Heterogeneity, I2 Result 95% CI Heterogeneity, I2 Result 95% CI Heterogeneity, I2
Pooled sensitivity 0.442 0.416–0.468 86.4% 0.594 0.556–0.631 76% 0.401 0.328–0.477 77.4% 0.195 0.128–0.278 73.1%
Pooled specificity 0.997 0.994–0.999 0 0.861 0.784–0.918 70.8% 0.995 0.982–0.999 17.9% 0.997 0.983–1.000 11.8%
Pooled LR, + 12.267 8.175–18.406 0 3.434 1.625–7.259 64.1% 7.001 3.336–14.691 0 9.573 3.611–25.379 0
Pooled LR, − 0.613 0.551–0.683 84.8% 0.542 0.462–0.637 29.8% 0.694 0.576–0.835 56.1% 0.733 0.522–1.030 85%
Pooled DOR SROC 23.939 15.388–37.242 0 7.588 3.944–14.598 0 14.469 6.100–34.320 0 14.808 4.966–44.156 2.2%
AUC 0.8711 0.7674 0.7999
Q* 0.8015 0.7079 0.7358

Note:

*

The Q index indicates the point at which sensitivity is equal to specificity. “–’’ indicates the AUC of the SROC was not significant in FN/SFN cases, since the lower limit of the AUC was less than 0.5.

Abbreviations: FNA, fine-needle aspiration; CI, confidence interval; LR, likelihood ratio; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; SROC, summary receiver-operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve.