Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2015 Feb;156(2):335–340. doi: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460314.73358.ff

Table 3.

Proportions of patients within each primary care providers (PCP) with guideline adherence and potential misuse outcomes.

PCP adherence proportions* Total (N = 67) mean % ± SD (range) Site 1 (n = 10) mean % ± SD (range) Site 2 (n = 12) mean % ± SD (range) Site 3 (n = 45) mean % ± SD (range) P
Opioid treatment agreement 48 ± 26 (0–100) 59 ± 25 (20–83) 51 ± 23 (0–75) 45 ± 27 (0–100) 0.30
Urine drug screen§ 56 ± 29 (0–100) 31 ± 27 (4–92) 35 ± 27 (0–71) 67 ± 23 (0–100) <0.0001
Early refills|| 36 ± 20 (0–75) 41 ± 16 (10–67) 25 ± 23 (0–57) 38 ± 19 (5–75) 0.09
*

Proportion of each individual PCP’s patients with each outcome.

χ2 test for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables across 3 sites.

Electronic health record documentation of an opioid treatment agreement ever.

§

Urine drug screen in the past 12 mo.

||

An opioid prescription written 7 to 25 d after the previous prescription for the same medication.