Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 22;72(Pt 5):346–355. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X16004623

Table 5. ITC analysis of fragment binding to EP.

Fragments 50, 51 and 91 could not be investigated using displacement ITC. The errors in ΔG°, K d and LE were estimated via error propagation using the standard deviation of three measurements of the displacement ligand. For details, see §2.7.

Fragment ΔG° (kJ mol−1) K d (mM) LE (kJ mol−1 atom−1)
29 −13.7 ± 0.1 4.0 ± 0.2 1.05 ± 0.01
30 −12.4 ± 0.2 6.8 ± 0.6 1.03 ± 0.02
39 −14.1 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 0.2 1.41 ± 0.01
42 −13.4 ± 0.2 4.5 ± 0.3 1.68 ± 0.02
53 >−11.4 >10.0 <0.95
97 14.1 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.2 1.18 ± 0.01

The ligand efficiency (LE) was calculated dividing −ΔG° by the number of non-H atoms in the fragment.