Skip to main content
. 2016 May 4;7:114. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00114

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Inhibitions of STIM1 mimics the effects of Phemindole and over expression of STIM1 showed opposite effect. (A) Ca2+ imaging was performed in control, in the presence of SKF 96365 (SOCE inhibitor) and STIM1 si-RNA treated MDAMB-231 cells. Analog plots of the fluorescence ratio (340/380) of the cells were shown. Knockdown of STIM1 protein was confirmed by western blot analysis (Inset) (B) Quantification (mean ± SD) of fluorescence ratio (340/380). P < 0.05 versus control. (C) Bar diagram showed MTT assay under SKF 96365, STIM1 si-RNA, treated conditions for 24 h in MDAMB231 cells. (D) STIM1 protein levels were restored by Transfection of STIM1 clones and also other protein levels were measured in presence and absence of Phemindole in STIM1 transfected cells by western blot (left panel). Quantification of band intensity in respect to loading control was shown in bar diagram (left panel). Blots are representative of three independent experiments and quantifications are indicated by bar diagram. Values were normalized by intensity of loading control. (E) Fura-2 Ca2+ imaging showing the results of a quantitative analysis of Ca2+ content (or Ca2+ release in after Tg treatment) and Ca2+ influx during SOCE as mentioned previously. Values are the mean ± SEM for all cells in plates p < 0.05 versus control group. (F) Bar diagram represented the cell proliferation pattern of STIM1 over expressed MDAMB-231 cells in presence of Phemindole treatment. Each bar gives the mean ± SEM of three separate experiments. ,∗∗,∗∗∗,# indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.0005, p > 0.05 respectively versus untreated or control group.