Table 5.
Pooled estimate | X2 test H0: X 2 < 7.8 (DF = 3) | t test H0:-1.96 < T<1.96 | Odds ratio | 95 % CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female gendera | −1.45 | 1.16 | −4.39 | 0.23 | 0.12–0.45 |
Age (years) | −0.21 | 5.68 | −2.71 | 0.81 | 0.70–0.94 |
Intermediate or higher education | 0.32 | 1.83 | 1.07 | Ns | |
Having a partner | −0.43 | 0.32 | −0.99 | Ns | |
Partner with paid worka | 1.49 | 3.58 | 4.19 | 4.42 | 3.70–15.77 |
Financial economic variables | |||||
Paid work in 2002/2003 | 3.16 | 0.91 | 7.44 | 23.52 | 10.61–56.01 |
Satisfied with income level | 0.48 | 1.34 | 1.51 | Ns | |
Satisfied with income and living standard | 0.59 | 1.20 | 1.80 | Ns | |
Functional limitations | |||||
No functional limitationsa | −0.62 | 0.99 | −1.80 | Ns | |
Health | |||||
Very good or good self-rated health | 0.79 | 0.10 | 2.62 | 2.19 | 1.22–3.95 |
Comorbidityb | −0.63 | 1.51 | −1.98 | 0.53 | 0.29–0.99 |
Personality | |||||
Neuroticism | −0.10 | 2.57 | −3.11 | 0.91 | 0.85–0.96 |
Social inadequacy | −0.07 | 3.26 | −2.16 | 0.93 | 0.88–0.99 |
Mastery | 0.13 | 1.88 | 2.49 | 1.13 | 1.03–1.25 |
Self esteem | 0.12 | 3.28 | 1.69 | 1.12 | 0.98–1.29 |
Workers at baseline only | |||||
Number of hours work per week | 0.02 | 3.43 | 1.49 | Ns | |
Occupational skills level | 0.30 | 3.48 | 1.35 | Ns | |
Occupational prestige level | 0.03 | 6.22 | 1.55 | Ns | |
High physical work demandsa | −0.58 | 1.58 | −0.89 | Ns | |
High psychosocial work demandsa | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.56 | Ns | |
Low psychosocial resources at worka | −0.12 | 1.31 | −0.18 | Ns |
Bold values are statistically significant p < 0.05
Ns not significant
aThe pooled estimate was calculated for three instead of four groups due to (nearly) empty cells. The corresponding Chi square value for DF = 2 is 5.9
bDifferent from the group with depression, cardiovascular disease or osteoarthritis