Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 20;2016:7292369. doi: 10.1155/2016/7292369

Table 3.

Informed decision-making about CRC screening participation among respondents with low and adequate health literacy (n = 141).

All respondents
n = 141
Respondents with low health literacy
n = 71
Respondents with adequate health literacy
n = 70
p value
Chi-square (Pearson)
p value ANOVA (F test)
Total knowledge of CRC and CRC screening, mean ± SD 13.57 ± 1.95 13.21 ± 2.20 13.94 ± 1.61 0.03 (F 5.09)
Knowledge
 Adequate, n (%) 90 (64) 43 (61) 47 (67) 0.41
 Inadequate, n (%) 51 (36) 28 (39) 23 (33)
Attitude towards CRC screening
 Positive, n (%) 129 (100) 60 (97) 67 (100) 0.14
 Negative, n (%) 0 (0) 2 (3) 0 (0)
 Missing 12 9 3
Intention to participate in CRC screening
 Positive, n (%) 126 (89) 63 (89) 63 (90) 0.81
 Negative, n (%) 15 (11) 8 (11) 7 (10)
Attitude-uptake consistency1
 Consistent, n (%) 116 (90) 56 (90) 60 (90) 0.89
 Not consistent, n (%) 13 (10) 6 (10) 7 (10)
 Missing 12 9 3
Informed decision-making
 Informed choice, n (%) 73 (57) 34 (55) 39 (58) 0.70
 No informed choice, n (%) 56 (43) 28 (45) 28 (42)
 Missing 12 9 3
Decisional conflict, mean ± SD 21.12 ± 15.54 25.82 ± 17.96 16.05 ± 10.37 0.00 (F 14.03)

p < 0.05 in bold.

1Attitude-uptake consistency means a combination of a negative attitude with an intention not to participate or a positive attitude with an intention to participate. Inconsistency means a negative attitude and an intention to participate or a positive attitude and an intention not to participate. Attitude-uptake inconsistency is one of the elements of uninformed choice.