Skip to main content
. 2016 May 4;6:25285. doi: 10.1038/srep25285

Table 2. The methodological quality of included studies.

Study A B C D E F Total
Jose 2001 [15] + + + + + ? 5
Valerie 2005 [16] + + + + + ? 5
Günther 2006 [17] + + + + + 5
Schupbach 2007 [18] + + + + ? 4
Witt 2008[19] + + + + + + 6
Frances 2009 [20] + + + + + + 6
Laura 2009[21] + + + ? ? 3
Adrian 2010 [22] + + + + + + 6
Kenneth 2010 [23] + + + + + + 6
Angelo 2011 [24] + + + ? ? 3
Lee 2011 [25] + + + + + ? 5
Laura 2012[26] + + + + ? ? 4
Frances 2012 [27] + + + + ? 4
Michael 2012 [28] + + + + + 5
Schuepbach 2013 [29] + + + + + + 6
Vincent 2013 [10] + + + + + + 6

A: Sequence generation; B: Allocation concealment; C: Blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessors;

D: Incomplete outcome data; E: No selective outcome reporting; F: Other sources of bias; +: Yes; −: No; ?: Unclear.