Skip to main content
letter
. 2016 Apr 8;6(4):e415. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2016.22

Table 1. Clinical and laboratory features of 722 patients with primary myelofibrosis patients stratified by grades of anemia.

Variables All (n=722) No anemia (n=94) Mild anemia (n=295) Moderate anemia (n=98) Severe anemia (n=235) P-value univariate P-value multivariate
Age at referral in years median (range) 64 (22–90) 60.5 (30–87) 61 (22–88) 64.5 (28–89) 69 (37–90) <0.0001 0.0002
Male (%) 464 (64%) 55 (59%) 192 (65%) 61 (62%) 156 (66%) 0.55  
Leukocytes, × 109/l median (range) 9 (0.8–236.1) 13.950 (2.8–4.1) 9.0 (1.1–176.0) 6.450 (1.7–236.1) 7.9 (0.8–218.5) <0.0001 0.061
Platelets, × 109/l median (range) 212.0 (10.0–466.0) 309.0 (15.0–288.0) 243.0 (13.0–255.0) 202.0 (14.0–282.0) 140.0 (10.0–2466.0) <0.0001 0.03
Circulating blasts % median (range) 1 (0–15) 0 (0–5) 0 (0–15) 1 (0–8) 1 (0–15) 0.0014 0.36
Presence of constitutional symptoms n (%) 231 (32%) 20 (21%) 79 (27%) 31 (32%) 101 (43%) <0.0001 0.04
Presence of palpable splenomegaly N evaluable=706 n (%) 514 (73%) 63 (68%) 208 (72%) 68 (72%) 175 (75%) 0.62  
DIPSS-plusa risk N evaluable =703           <0.0001  
 Low 94 (13%) 31 (34%) 61 (21%) 2 (2%) 0 (0%)    
 Intermediate-1 119 (17%) 27 (29%) 85 (30%) 7 (7%) 0 (0%)    
 Intermediate-2 259 (37%) 27 (29%) 109 (38%) 62 (64%) 61 (27%)    
 High 231 (33%) 7 (8%) 29 (10%) 26 (27%) 169 (73%)    
Driver mutations           <0.0001  
JAK2 mutated n (%) 476 (66%) 73 (78%) 175 (59%) 66 (67%) 162 (69%)   0.03
CALR type 1/type 1-like n (%) 115 (16%) 12 (13%) 70 (24%) 14 (14%) 19 (8%)   0.01
CALR type 2/type 2-like n (%) 24 (3%) 1 (1%) 14 (5%) 5 (5%) 4(2%)    
MPL mutated n (%) 38 (5%) 0 (0%) 18 (6%) 6 (6%) 14 (6%)    
 Triple negative n (%) 69(10%) 8 (8%) 18 (6%) 7 (7%) 36 (15%)    
               
Cytogenetic categories N evaluable =703 (97%)
 Normal 426 (61%) 64 (70%) 173 (61%) 56 (58%) 133 (58%)    
 Normal vs abnormal           0.24  
 Favorable 620 (88%) 82 (89%) 255 (90%) 87 (90%) 196 (85%)    
 Favorable vs unfavorable           0.40  
ASXL1 N evaluable=480 181(38%) 21 (31%) 70 (36%) 28 (42%) 62 (41%) 0.50  
SF3B1 N evaluable=415 35 (8%) 4 (7%) 11 (7%) 6 (10%) 14 (10%) 0.64  
U2AF1 N evaluable=457 72 (16%) 2 (3%) 15 (8%) 11 (18%) 44 (30%) <0.0001 <0.0001
SRSF2 N evaluable=474 70 (15%) 9 (13%) 24 (13%) 6 (9%) 31 (20%) 0.09  
TET2 N evaluable=180 32 (18%) 2 (7%) 13 (19%) 7 (30%) 10 (16%) 0.21  
EZH2 N evaluable=374 16 (4%) 2 (4%) 8 (5%) 2 (4%) 4 (3%) 0.85  
ZRSR2 N evaluable=180 19 (11%) 1 (4%) 11 (16%) 0 (0%) 7 (11%) 0.11  
IDH1 N evaluable=187 9 (5%) 1 (4%) 3 (4%) 2 (8%) 3 (5%) 0.87  
IDH2 N evaluable=187 14 (7%) 1 (4%) 5 (7%) 1 (4%) 7 (11%) 0.58  

Abbreviation: DIPSS-plus, dynamic international prognostic scoring system-plus.

a

DIPSS-plus:5 DIPSS-plus uses eight independent predictors of inferior survival: age >65 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dl, leukocytes >25 × 109/l, circulating blasts ⩾1%, constitutional symptoms, red cell transfusion dependency, platelet count <100x109/l and unfavorable karyotype (that is, complex karyotype or sole or two abnormalities that include þ8, −7/7q−, i(17q), inv,3 −5/5q−, 12p− or 11q23 rearrangement). The presence of 0, 1, ‘2 or 3' and 4 adverse factors defines low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2 and high-risk disease. Statistically significant P-values are in bold.