Skip to main content
. 2016 May 3;16:93. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0264-8

Table 3.

Caregiver characteristics according to caregiver diabetes status

Characteristica Overall N = 1494b Caregivers with diabetes N = 127 Caregivers without diabetes N = 1367 P-value
Caregiver characteristics
Age, yearsc 67.3 (12.04) 72.4 (9.67) 66.9 (12.13) <0.001
Sex, n (%) female 958 (64.2) 69 (54.3) 889 (65.1) 0.012
Marital status, n (%) 0.022
 Married/cohabiting 1316 (88.1) 123 (96.9) 1193 (87.3)
 Widowed 38 (2.5) 1 (0.8) 37 (2.7)
 Divorced/separated 70 (4.7) 1 (0.8) 69 (5.1)
 Never married 69 (4.6) 2 (1.6) 67 (4.9)
Relationship to the patient, n (%) <0.001
 Wife 503 (33.7) 50 (39.4) 453 (33.2)
 Husband 481 (32.2) 53 (41.7) 428 (31.3)
 Child 405 (27.1) 13 (10.2) 392 (28.7)
 Friend 20 (1.3) 2 (1.6) 18 (1.3)
 Other 84 (5.6) 9 (7.1) 75 (5.5)
Caregiver lives with the patient, n (%) 1135 (76.0) 113 (89.0) 1022 (74.8) <0.001
Caregivers with medical conditionsd, n (%) 127 (100) 748 (54.7) 875 (58.6) 0.178
Diabetes drug use, n (%) 118 (92.9)

aData are presented as mean (SD) unless indicated otherwise. Percentages reported are for caregivers with data available for each specific variable. Missing data (overall) were n = 1 for all variables, except medical conditions and diabetes drug use (no missing data)

bDiabetes status was unknown for one caregiver, thus N = 1494

cThe Case Report Form collected only birth year data, thus the missing month and day were imputed with 15 July. Age is the year part of the difference between the date of Informed Consent and the imputed birth date

dData include the presence of diabetes

P-values are for the comparison between caregiver diabetes groups (ANOVA for continuous variables, with country and diabetes status as factors, and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test for categorical variables, with stratification by country)

P-values indicating statistically significant differences between caregiver diabetes groups (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold type