Skip to main content
. 2016 May 4;9:99. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0513-2

Table 1.

Chemical composition of internode fractions from six different sugarcane hybrids

Sugarcane hybrids Internode region Chemical composition (%, w/w on oven dry basis)
Ethanol-soluble extractives Glucan Xylan Arabinosyl Acetyl Lignin
Acid insoluble Acid soluble Total lignin
H 89 Pith 1.4 ± 0.2 55.0 ± 0.1 14.5 ± 0.1 3.7 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.1 11.0 ± 0.5 2.9 ± 0.3 13.9 ± 0.4
Interface 2.2 ± 0.1 46.5 ± 0.3 18.9 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.1 3.5 ± 0.1 17.3 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.3 20.5 ± 0.3
Rind 2.6 ± 0.1 43.7 ± 0.3 22.7 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.1 3.7 ± 0.1 19.4 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.2 21.7 ± 0.4
H 146 Pith 3.2 ± 0.1 44.1 ± 0.5 20.4 ± 0.1 2.6 ± 0.1 4.1 ± 0.1 15.0 ± 0.4 2.9 ± 0.1 17.9 ± 0.3
Interface 4.8 ± 0.2 38.1 ± 0.9 20.7 ± 0.6 1.8 ± 0.1 4.2 ± 0.2 18.8 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 0.4 22.0 ± 0.3
Rind 4.3 ± 0.4 43.6 ± 0.1 21.3 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1 3.6 ± 0.1 18.9 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.4 21.6 ± 0.3
H 58 Pith 1.4 ± 0.2 51.8 ± 0.1 17.5 ± 0.1 2.9 ± 0.1 3.9 ± 0.3 10.2 ± 0.2 4.1 ± 0.7 14.3 ± 0.5
Interface 3.4 ± 0.2 47.0 ± 0.1 19.9 ± 0.1 2.4 ± 0.1 4.0 ± 0.1 14.3 ± 0.9 2.7 ± 0.2 17.0 ± 0.6
Rind 3.0 ± 0.2 44.1 ± 0.2 22.5 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.1 4.3 ± 0.3 16.8 ± 0.7 3.3 ± 0.1 20.1 ± 0.5
H 166 Pith 3.3 ± 0.2 50.0 ± 0.1 17.6 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.1 14.1 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.1 16.9 ± 0.1
Interface 5.1 ± 0.1 42.1 ± 0.6 20.1 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.1 3.6 ± 0.4 18.0 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.1 20.8 ± 0.1
Rind 3.2 ± 0.1 43.8 ± 0.1 20.4 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.1 3.7 ± 0.1 19.2 ± 0.1 2.4 ± 0.1 21.6 ± 0.1
H 321 Pith 5.1 ± 0.1 43.1 ± 0.1 19.6 ± 0.5 2.9 ± 0.2 3.7 ± 0.1 16.9 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.1 20.1 ± 0.1
Interface 2.4 ± 0.2 38.5 ± 0.2 20.2 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.1 4.1 ± 0.1 20.8 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.2 23.8 ± 0.1
Rind 4.0 ± 0.1 42 ± 2 20.7 ± 0.7 1.4 ± 0.1 3.8 ± 0.1 19.5 ± 0.2 2.4 ± 0.1 22.0 ± 0.2
H 140 Pith 3.6 ± 0.1 39.9 ± 0.4 19.2 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.3 19.0 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.5 21.9 ± 0.4
Interface 2.5 ± 0.3 40.8 ± 0.1 21.6 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.1 4.6 ± 0.1 17.5 ± 0.9 3.2 ± 0.8 20.7 ± 0.8
Rind 3.1 ± 0.1 40.5 ± 0.7 22.1 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.1 3.1 ± 0.4 19.8 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.1 22.4 ± 0.2