Skip to main content
. 2016 May 4;17:198. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1048-1

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies assessing the effects of THA on SQoL

First author, country Study design Aim/Objective N of patients (Response Rate) Diagnosis n (%) Main inclusion criteria Mean Age (years) n (%), Male n (%), Female Duration of follow up, after surgery
Todd 1972 UK Retrospective, cohort studyd Interview (Int) and Survey Incidence of SD and influence of THR on SQoL Int: 123/292 (42 %) Surv: 79/134 (58 %) HAa Patients undergone THR with active sexual relationship at time of onset HA; Interview NA M61 (30–79) F 60 (29–79) Interview NA 49(40) 36 (46) Interview NA 74(60) 43 (54) Int: NA Surv: NA
Wiklund 1991 Sweden Case-control study, Survey To evaluation of QoL before and after THR in patients with HA 56/57 (98 %)g Prim. HA: 40 (71 %) Sec. HA: 16 (29 %) incl 1 RAb Patients with HA < 80 year; awaiting THR 65 (30–79) 21 (38) 35 (63) 1 year
Stern 1991 USA Retrospective, cohort study, Survey To determine the effect of THR on SF incl. sexual positions and resumption SA after THA 86/100 (86 %) Prim. HA: 74 (86 %) Sec. HA: 12 (14 %) of which 4 dysplasia and 8 RAb Patients with predominantly HA all undergone THR and <70 y, all satisfied about results THR 57 (20–70) 39 (45)  47 (55) At time postoperative routine visit
Laupacis 1993 Canada Prospective, double-blind randomized trial, Survey Effect of THR on health related QoL 188/ 251 (75 %) HAa Patients with HA, < 75 years, no severe OA of other hip, no previous THR or THK (knee) < 5 years, nor infectious arthritis 64 (40–75) 97 (53) 91 (47) 3 months 6 monthsh 1 year 2 year
Gogia 1994 USA Prospective cohort study, Survey Developing evaluation system to assess clinical outcome of THR related to changes in functional status and pain 22/24 (92 %) HAa Patients with HA, undergoing THR; alert oriented, ambulatory with or without assistive devices 69,2 (57–86) 4 (18) 18 (82) 3 and 6 monthsh
Gosens 2005, The Netherlands Prospective, multicentre cohort study, Survey Translating and validating Oxford Hip Score into Dutch 146/150 (100 %) Prim. HA: 117 (78 %) Sec. HA: 33 (22 %) Age >35 year; patients awaiting THR; No systematic illness and physically and mentally suitable, understanding Dutch language 65 (38–85) 52 (35) 98 (65) 7 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthsh; 1 year; 2 year
First author, country Study design Aim/Objective N of patients (Response Rate) Diagnosis n (%) Main inclusion criteria Mean Age (years) n (%), Male n (%), Feale Duration of follow up, after surgery
Laffosse 2007 France Retrospective, cohort study, Survey SD in patients before and after THR; receiving sufficient information 135/346 (39 %) Prim. HA: 56 (42 %) <65 year, undergone THR min. 6 months previously; Revision and Femoral Neck Fracture excluded 51,8 (22–65) 77 (57) 58 (43) ≥6 months
Sec. HA: 76 (58 %) Incl. 3 RAb
Wall 2011 UK Prospective cohort study, Survey To determine the effect of HA on SQoL and to assess wheter a SQoL is considered in surgical plan 86/100 (86 %) Prim. HA: 74 (86 %) <75 Year, undergoing THR, living with a partner 62 (48–74) 39 (45) 47 (55) 6 months
Sec. HA: 12 (14 %) Incl. 3 RAb
Yoon 2013 Korea Retrospective, cohort study, face-to-face interview To determine concerns related to SQoL; to determine changes in SA after THR 64/512 (13 %) Prim. HA: 11 (17 %) Sec. HA: 53 (83 %) Incl. 2 RAb, 5 ASd Sexual active patients during previous last year, No dislocation, infection or stiffness. 50e 45 (NA) 19 (NA) ≥6 months, at routine follow up visit
Wang 2014 Japan Prospective, multicentre cohort study, Survey To evaluate the influence of ONFH and THR on SQoL 247/300 (82 %) Sec. HA: all males, ONFH patients (247) SA married adults, only ONFH males, Age >25- < 60. Excluded severe comorbiditiesf 46,8 (34.7–58.9) 247 (100) 1 year
Nunley 2014 USA Retrospective multicentre cohort study, Survey To evaluate SQoL in young active patients following THR. 791/806 (98 %)c Prim. and non inflammentoire Sec. HAa ≤60 year; THR and SRA patients, no history postoperative complications UCLA score >6i 49,5 (42.3–56.7) 531 (66) j 275 (34) j 2,3 years (±0,8)
Klit 2014 Denmark Prospective multicentre cohort study, Survey To explore any -positive or negative- effect THR have had on sexual function, sexual frequency and sexual practice, in younger THR patients 136/153 (89 %) Young HAa patients awaiting THR: n86) (Hip Resurfacing: n44) <60 Year, undergoing primary THR/HR, not suffering from cognitive dysfunction or malignant disease, able to fill in questionnaire 53 (48–57) 68 (50) 68 (50) 3 months 6 months 1 year h

aUnspecified numbers and HA type

bSome RA and AS patients were included because data could not slit up

cUsed modern bearing surfaces: SRA = Surface Replacement Arthroplasty; SRA treatment: n 122 (15 %) (181 control patients)

d started with interview, continued with survey

eMean age derived

fComorbidities e.g. affecting heart lung, liver, kidneys; patients under medications; psychiatric history; having mental retardation

gControl group not specified

hduration of follow up used in this review

iPre-symptomatic activity score of University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)

jN not corrected by gender (-15 respondents)