Skip to main content
. 2016 May 4;17:198. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1048-1

Table 4.

Postoperative outcomes of SQoL

Study Quality level Physical-Functional Outcomes of SQoL (n in study) Psychosocial outcomes of SQoL (n in study) Postoperative n (%) p value
Todd, et al. 1973 [23] L Relief SD: Females (n 32/37)a:
Complete
Considerable
Slight
Nil
4 (13 %)
12 (38 %)
6 (19 %)
10 (31 %)
-
Relief SD: Males (n 22/23)b
Complete
Considerable
Slight
Nil
6 (27 %)
5 (23 %)
2 (9 %)
9 (41 %)
-
(n 60) Need for more advice 34 (57 %)
Stern, et al. 1991 [22] L SF: Time to resume (n75/86):
1–2 months
≤1 month
≥2 months
Females = males

41(55 %)
8 (11 %)
26 (34 %)
males sooner



<0.01
(n 64) Need for more advice 57 (89 %)
Argument to undergo THR: 15 (20 %)
Laffosse, et al. 2008 [26] L SF: Coital Frequency (n130/135)
Increased:
Unchanged:
Decreased:
24 (18,5 %)
91 (70 %)
15 (11,5 %)
Increased, more women than men 0.02
Not able to obtain information 110 (83 %)
Argument to undergo THR: 21 (18,5 %)
SF: Resuming time (n 135)
Females (n 58)
Males (n 77)
Never having resumed again

(n77)
66,5 days (4–365)
87 days (4–365)
54 days (5–210)
3 (2 %)

0.0005
Wall, et al. 2011 [24] L Overall effect on SA (n 53/86):
Much better
Better
No Change
Worse
Much worse
44 (81 %)
9 (17 %)
0
0
0
Concerns partner: (Fear hurting spouse) 7/54 (12 %)
Yoon, et al. 2013 [13] L Time to resume SA: (n 64/64) 6,19 months (3weeks - 48months)
Difficulty with leg positioning (females more than males) 25 (39 %) 0.045 #
Changing Sexual Positions (more frequently for patients with diff. leg positioning) 26 (40,6 %) <0.01
- Muscle weakness (Males n 6) 11 (17,2 %)
Not able to obtain information 51/62 (80 %)
Concerns
- Fear of dislocations
Males
Females
33 (51,6 %)
23/45 (51 %)
10/19 (53 %)
Effect on relationship (males):
Lack of understanding spouse

3 (4,7 %)
Effect on satisfaction:
- Same
- Increase
- Less

44 (68,8 %)
15 (23,4 %)
5 (7,9 %)
Satisfaction correlated to stress ≤stress = 
≥satisfaction
0.03
Nunley, et al. 2015 [15] M SA since surgery (n 791)c
No Sexual Activity (due to operative hip)
708 (89,5 %)
10 (1,3 %)
# 0.0061
Odds 1.953
Sex Frequency:
- Less:
- Same:
- More:
n 694
31 (4,5 %)
361 (52 %)
302 (43,5 %)
# ‘less’
<0.0001
Odds 0.130
# ‘More’
<0.001
Odds 3.422
If ‘more’ caused by:
- less pain
- greater mobility
- less apprehension

294 (98 %)
288 (95,4 %)
224 (74,5 %)
Sex quality compared to 1 month prior surgery
- Worse:
- Same:
- Better:
(n 697)
'
13 (2,2 %)
195 (28 %)
487 (69,9 %)
# ‘Better’ <0.0001 Odds 10.596
If ‘better’ caused by:
- less pain
- greater mobility

481 (98,8 %)
458 (94,2 %)
-less apprehension 310 (64,2 %)
Concerns at least one episode
Felt hip slipping-out during SA (instability)

22 (3,1 %)
Had to limit SA due to operation 81 (11,6 %) # <0.0016
Odds 3.150
Klit, et al. 2015 [25] L Time to resume SA (n 136)
≤ 8 weeks
> 8 weeks

55/83 (66 %)
10/83 (12 %)
Sexual Frequency: females 12 % increase 38 % better abilities sexual praxis
84 % of them experienced associated increased ROM, decreased pain and fear
Sexual Frequency: males No changes
Erectile dysfunction: males 3/68 (4 %)

SD Sexual Dysfunction, SF Sexual Function, SA Sexual Activity

a adjusted for 5 = ‘No reply’

b adjusted for 1 = ‘No reply’

c within the past year #Comparison of SA, Quality and Frequency between THR and Control cohort with Odds ratios