Skip to main content
. 2016 May 4;17:198. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1048-1

Table 7.

Individual scores of the Quality Assessment per study, per item

First author 1 2 3 4 5 6 SubTa 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 SubTb 15 16 17 SubTc Total score
Todd 0 1 1 1 0 1 4/6 = 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 5/8 = 1 NA NA NA 3/3 = 1 LOW 3/3
Wiklund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/6 = 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 4/8 = 1 0 1 1 2/3 = 1 LOW 2/3
Stern 0 0 0 1 0 0 1/6 = 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6/8 = 1 0 1 1 2/3 = 1 LOW 3/3
Laupacis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/6 = 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 4/8 = 1 0 1 1 2/3 = 1 LOW 2/3
Gogia 0 0 1 1 0 0 2/6 = 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6/8 = 1 0 1 1 2/3 = 1 LOW 3/3
Gosens 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/6 = 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 4/8 = 1 NA NA NA 3/3 = 1 LOW 2/3
Laffosse 0 0 1 1 1 1 4/6 = 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 5/8 = 1 1 1 1 3/3 = 1 LOW 3/3
Wall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/6 = 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 4/8 = 1 NA NA NA 3/3 = 1 LOW 3/3
Yoon 0 0 1 1 0 0 2/6 = 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6/8 = 1 0 1 1 2/3 = 1 LOW 3/3
Wang 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/6 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/8 = 0 0 1 1 2/3 = 1 MED 1/3
Nunley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/6 = 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2/8 = 1 0 0 0 0/3 = 0 MED 1/3
Klit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/6 = 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 6/8 = 1 0 1 1 2/3 = 1 LOW 3/3

SubTotal aSelection bias bInformation bias c Statistical analysis bias