Table 1.
Sample sizes and genetic diversity statistics for 16 nDNA microsatellite loci and an mtDNA marker
| nDNA | mtDNA | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | Population code | Date of sampling | N | AR | HO | HE | FIS | N | h | Hd | π |
| Kitgum | KT-0 | January 2012 | 17 | 3.88 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.1173 | 9 | 4 | 0.6944 | 0.0021 |
| KT-22 | October 2014 | 20 | 3.96 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.0792 | 10 | 3 | 0.3778 | 0.0010 | |
| Oculoi | OC-0 | July 2011 | 20 | 3.51 | 0.58 | 0.56 | -0.0413 | 16 | 6 | 0.7667 | 0.0037 |
| OC-27 | December 2014 | 25 | 3.56 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.0097 | 10 | 3 | 0.5111 | 0.0014 | |
| Aminakwach | AM-0 | July 2011 | 30 | 3.46 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.0507 | 16 | 3 | 0.4917 | 0.0013 |
| AM-27 | December 2014 | 25 | 3.45 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.0312 | 10 | 3 | 0.3778 | 0.0010 | |
| Karuma | KR-0 | February 2010 | 60 | 4.50 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.1303 | 9 | 3 | 0.6667 | 0.0062 |
| KR-35 | July 2014 | 25 | 4.08 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.0686 | 10 | 5 | 0.8444 | 0.0085 | |
| Apac | AP-0 | September 2008 | 15 | 3.78 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 0.1668 | 15 | 6 | 0.7619 | 0.0026 |
| AP-48 | March 2014 | 29 | 3.78 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.0538 | 10 | 5 | 0.7556 | 0.0024 | |
| Kole | KO-0 | July 2010 | 15 | 4.14 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.1428 | 10 | 4 | 0.7333 | 0.0025 |
| KO-29 | March 2014 | 20 | 4.03 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.0282 | 10 | 5 | 0.7556 | 0.0031 | |
| Arua | AR-0 | January 2008 | 15 | 4.30 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.0159 | 15 | 3 | 0.5333 | 0.0015 |
| AR-52 | June 2014 | 25 | 4.28 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.1443 | 10 | 5 | 0.6667 | 0.0025 | |
| Pader | PD-0 | January 2008 | 13 | 4.51 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.0905 | 10 | 2 | 0.2000 | 0.0005 |
| PD-52 | October 2014 | 15 | 4.09 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.0679 | 10 | 4 | 0.7111 | 0.0035 | |
| Moyo | MY-0 | August 2009 | 15 | 4.06 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.0671 | 17 | 3 | 0.5441 | 0.0015 |
| MY-38 | June 2014 | 20 | 4.01 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.1322 | 10 | 3 | 0.5111 | 0.0014 | |
Sample sizes and genetic diversity statistics for 16 microsatellite loci and an mtDNA marker across nine populations (18 sampled time points) of G. f. fuscipes in northern Uganda (Fig. 1). Population codes are shown followed by the time interval (in generations) since the first sampling. N number of samples analyzed, A R allele richness, H E expected heterozygosity, Ho observed heterozygosity, F IS Fisher’s inbreeding coefficient, h number of haplotypes, H d haplotype diversity, π nucleotide diversity. FIS was calculated using Genepop v4.2 [34]; HO and HE were computed in Arlequin v3.5, and AR were estimated using FSTAT v3.1 Hd, h, and π were computed using DnaSP v5.1