Table 1.
Number and Percent of Reviewed Studies Collecting and Reporting FOI Data in Rigorous Manner for FOI Dimensions
FOI
Dimension Sub-Dimension |
Studies Measuring |
Studies
Using Observational Measures |
Studies Where >1 Source Used |
Studies Assessing Reliability or Validity |
Studies Establishing A-Priori Cut-offs |
Studies Monitoring Comparison Condition |
Studies Reporting Adaptations |
Studies Reporting Level of FOI |
Studies Linking Aspect(s) of FOI to Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Adherence |
9 (19%) | 7 (15%) | 3 (6%) | 1 (2%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (6%) | 8 (17%) | 0 (0%) |
Program Quality |
5 (10%) | 2 (4%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (8%) | 0 (0%) |
Participant Dosage |
23 (48%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (6%) | 5 (10%) | 0 (0%) | 22 (46%) | 6 (13%) |
Session Attendance |
16 (33%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (6%) | 5 (10%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (31%) | 3 (6%) |
Outside Practice |
16 (33%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (31%) | 3 (6%) |
Participant Responsiveness |
7 (15%) | 3 (6%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (10%) | 0 (0%) |