Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2016 May;8(2):89–124. doi: 10.1257/pol.20140224

Table 6.

Cross country differences in postneonatal and neonatal mortality, by group

Panel A: Postneonatal mortality
(1) (2)
US versus Austria US versus Finland

United States 1.357 (0.046) *** 0.920 (0.064) ***
advantaged −0.093 (0.144) −0.296 (0.129) **
United States × advantaged −1.146 (0.145) *** −0.941 (0.130) ***
# of observations 23,505,784 23,347,108
high SES, US vs. Europe 0.126 0.853
Panel B: Neonatal mortality
(1) (2)
US versus Austria US versus Finland

United States 0.024 (0.068) −0.149 (0.083) *
advantaged −0.259 (0.218) −0.080 (0.192)
United States × advantaged 0.063 (0.219) −0.116 (0.193)
# of observations 23,565,160 23,406,026
high SES, US vs. Europe 0.675 0.128

Notes: This table shows differences across countries in mortality by advantaged versus disadvantaged group. The regressions adjust for 500-gram birth weight category cells. The regression results are conditional on surviving to 1 month of age. “Advantaged” is as defined in the text (mothers who are high education/occupation, married and white (in the US) or non-immigrant (in Austria)). Coefficients are in units of 1000 deaths: a coefficient of 1 indicates an increase of 1 death in 1000 births. Robust standard errors in parentheses.

***

significant at 1% level

**

significant at 5% level

*

significant at 10% level.

Data for all countries cover 2000-2005; as described in the text, the sample is limited to singleton births at ≥22 weeks of gestation and ≥500 grams with no missing covariates. The last row in each panel reports the p-value from a test for equality between the advantaged group in the US relative to the advantaged group in the comparison country.