Table 1.
Behavioral and cognitive profile | Diagnosis based on | Follow up | Functional status | |
---|---|---|---|---|
phFTD patients | ||||
1 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, loss of empathy |
No progression for 4 years | Clinical 5 visits 5 year FU Neuropsychological 4 visits 4 year FU |
Stable as reported by both patient and caregiver. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (3rd visit): Orientation to person, time, place: unimpaired Memory: average Language: below average to average Attention: average to poor Executive functions: average to poor Information processing speed: below average Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Social cognition: poor Conclusion: although the impairments listed above are suspect for FTD, the absence of evident cognitive decline and the long disease course render this diagnosis less likely. | ||||
2 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, apathy, compulsive behavior, hyperorality |
No progression for 9 years | Clinical 9 visits 9 years Neuropsychological 3 visits 8.8 years |
Stable as reported by both patient and caregiver. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (3rd visit): Orientation to person, time, place: unimpaired Memory: unimpaired Language: average to poor Attention: average to poor Executive functions: average to below average Information processing speed: below average Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Social cognition: poor Conclusion: although the impairments listed above and the clinical presentation are suspect for FTD, the patient's intact insight into his/her own functioning, the absence of any evident cognitive decline and the very long disease course render this diagnosis less likely. | ||||
3 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, loss of empathy, loss of insight |
No progression for 1 year | Clinical 3 visits 1 year Neuropsychological 2 visits 1 year |
Stable as reported by both patient and caregiver. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (2nd visit): Orientation to person, time, place: unimpaired Memory: highly variable (unimpaired to poor) Language: average to poor Attention: below average to poor Executive functions: average to poor Information processing speed: average Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Social cognition: poor Conclusion: compared to the previous neuropsychological evaluation there is no evident cognitive decline. | ||||
4 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, loss of insight |
No progression for 5 years | Clinical 5 visits 5 year Neuropsychological 3 visits 4.8 years |
Patient reports minor difficulties at work, but performs activities of daily living independently and has no difficulties operating appliances according to caregiver. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (3rd visit): Orientation to person and place: unimpaired; to time: sufficient Memory: unimpaired to below average Language: below to above average Attention: average to poor Executive functions: below average to poor Information processing speed: average to below average Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Social cognition: average Conclusion: although the impairments listed above and the clinical presentation as well as the cognitive decline reported by patient and caregiver are suspect for FTD, the absence of evident cognitive decline renders this diagnosis less likely. | ||||
5 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, apathy, loss of empathy |
No progression for 6 years | Clinical 9 visits 6 years Neuropsychological 5 visits 5.9 years |
Minor difficulties reported by patient at first and second visits which had stabilized or improved at later visits, e.g. disorientation while driving, but not anymore when driving using GPS navigation, confirmed by caregiver. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (5th visit): Orientation to person, time, place: unimpaired Memory: average Language: average Attention: average to above average Executive functions: above average Information processing speed: above average Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Social cognition: below average Conclusion: the results are similar to previous neuropsychological examinations. There are no indications for cognitive impairment. | ||||
6 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, apathy, loss of empathy |
No progression for 1.2 years (slight functional decline but no clinical or cognitive deterioration). | Clinical 5 visits 1.2 years Neuropsychological 2 visits 1.2 years |
Very slow progression but performs activities of daily living independently according to caregiver. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (2nd visit): Orientation to person, time, place: unimpaired Memory: average to poor Language: average Attention: below to above average Executive functions: average to poor Information processing speed: average Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Social cognition: below average Conclusion: although the impairments listed above and the clinical presentation are suspect for FTD, the patient's intact insight into his/her own functioning and the absence of any cognitive decline render this diagnosis less likely. | ||||
7 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, apathy, loss of empathy, hyperorality |
No progression for 10 years | Clinical 9 visits 10.1 years Neuropsychological 4 visits 9.7 years |
Activities of daily living are scarcely performed due to the patient's severe apathy according to caregiver. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (4th visit): Orientation to person, time, place: unimpaired Memory: average to poor Language: average to poor Attention: below average to poor Executive functions: average to poor Information processing speed: average Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Social cognition: poor Conclusion: although the impairments listed above and the clinical presentation as well as the cognitive decline reported by the caregiver are suspect for FTD, the absence of evident cognitive decline renders this diagnosis less likely. | ||||
bvFTD patients | ||||
1 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, loss of empathy |
Clinical presentation as well as functional and cognitive decline | Clinical 2 visits 1 year Neuropsychological evaluation 2 visits 1 years |
Functional decline reported by caregiver of several (instrumental) activities of daily living. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (2nd visit): Orientation to person and place: unimpaired; to time: impaired Memory: average to poor Language: below average Attention: poor Executive functions: average to poor Information processing speed: average Visuoconstructive ability: poor Conclusion: although previous neuropsychological evaluation did not provide any indication for a neurodegenerative disorder, the newly reported information by patient and caregiver and the cognitive decline substantiated by the current evaluation support the diagnosis of FTD. | ||||
2 | Behavioral symptoms: Apathy, loss of empathy |
Clinical presentation as well as functional and cognitive decline | Clinical 3 visits 1.8 years Neuropsychological evaluation 2 visits 1.3 years |
Functional decline reported by patient and caregiver of several (instrumental) activities of daily living. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (2nd visit): Orientation to person, time, place: unimpaired Memory: above average to average Language: unimpaired to below average Attention: average to poor Executive functions: average to below average Information processing speed: below average Visuoconstructive ability: below average Conclusion: compared to the previous neuropsychological evaluation, memory remained intact, but there is cognitive decline specifically in the domains of attention and executive functioning, indicative of a dementia syndrome, most likely FTD. | ||||
3 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, apathy, loss of empathy, loss of insight, hyperorality |
Clinical presentation, functional decline and cognitive impairment | Clinical 3 visits 2 months Neuropsychological evaluation 1 visit |
Functional decline reported by caregiver of several (instrumental) activities of daily living. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (1st visit): Orientation to person and time: unimpaired; to place: impaired Memory: below average to poor Language: poor Attention: average to poor Executive functions: poor Visuoconstructive ability: average Conclusion: the cognitive profile is indicative of dementia, clinically presenting as FTD. | ||||
4 | Behavioral symptoms: Apathy, loss of empathy, compulsive behavior |
Clinical presentation as well as and functional and cognitive decline | Clinical 3 visits 1.3 years Neuropsychological evaluation 2 visits 1.3 years |
Progressive functional decline as reported by caregiver. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (2nd visit): Orientation to person, time, place: unimpaired Memory: poor Language: below average to poor Attention: average to poor Executive functions: unimpaired Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Information processing speed: below average Conclusion: the decline in the cognitive domains of langue, attention and information processing speed compared to the previous neuropsychological evaluation, as well as the current overall cognitive profile and clinical presentation are indicative of FTD. | ||||
5 | Behavioral symptoms: Apathy, loss of insight, stereotyped and compulsive behavior, hyperorality |
Clinical presentation as well as functional and cognitive decline | Clinical 4 visits 2 years Neuropsychological evaluation 2 visits 1.3 years |
Progressive functional decline as reported by caregiver, eventual admission to nursing home. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (2nd visit): Orientation to person,: unimpaired; to time and place: impaired Memory: average to poor Language: average to poor Attention: below average to poor Executive functions: poor Information processing speed: average Visuoconstructive ability: poor (due to executive dysfunction) Conclusion: the cognitive decline in domains of attention and executive functioning and impairment on other domains, combined with the clinical presentation fit the profile of bvFTD. | ||||
6 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, compulsive behavior, hyperorality |
Clinical presentation as well as functional and cognitive impairment. | Clinical 6 visits 2.4 years Neuropsychological evaluation 1 visit |
Minor difficulties with operating appliances, grocery shopping, and laundry, as reported by caregiver. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (1st visit): Orientation to person, time, place: unimpaired Memory: unimpaired Language: below average to poor Attention: below average Executive functions: below average Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Conclusion: the mildly impaired attention and executive functions, combined with impaired language and intact memory and praxis, may be indicative of FTD | ||||
7 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, loss of empathy, compulsive behavior |
Clinical presentation, functional decline and cognitive impairment. C9ORF72 mutation present. | Clinical 5 visits 1.5 years Neuropsychological evaluation 1 visit |
Progressive functional decline as reported by caregiver, eventual admission to day care (5 days a week). |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (1st visit): Orientation to person, time, place: unimpaired Memory: poor Language: below average to poor Attention: average to poor Executive functions: average Visuoconstructive ability: average Conclusion: the focal impairment in the language domain could possibly be attributed to logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) but the absence of memory impairment and the prominent behavioral symptoms are not typical for LPA. | ||||
8 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, loss of empathy, loss of insight, stereotyped and compulsive behavior |
Screened for MAPT mutation before the onset of symptoms because of positive family history. Clinical conversion to FTD confirmed 1.3 years later (based on clinical presentation, cognitive and functional decline). | Clinical 5 visits 1.3 year Neuropsychological evaluation 2 visits 1.4 year |
Functional decline reported initially by patient and later by caregiver of several (instrumental) activities of daily living. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (2nd visit): Orientation to person, time, place: unimpaired Memory: average to below average Language: below average to poor Attention: unimpaired Executive functions: unimpaired to below average Information processing speed: unimpaired Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Social cognition: poor Conclusion: the cognitive profile of impairment in language, memory and social cognition, combined with the cognitive decline compared to the previous neuropsychological evaluation and clinical presentation, are compatible with (conversion to) bvFTD. | ||||
9 | Behavioral symptoms: Behavioral disinhibition, apathy, loss of empathy, compulsive behavior |
Clinical presentation as well as functional and cognitive decline. | Clinical 2 visits 1 week Neuropsychological 1 visit. Test results of neuropsychological evaluation conducted 6 months earlier elsewhere were also available. |
Functional decline of several (instrumental) activities of daily living decline reported by caregiver. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (1st visit, compared to neuropsychological exam performed elsewhere): Orientation to person and place: unimpaired; to time: sufficient Memory: highly variable (unimpaired to poor) average Language: highly variable (unimpaired to poor) Attention: unimpaired Executive functions: average to poor Information processing speed: below average Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Social cognition: poor Conclusion: the cognitive profile of impairment in language, memory and social cognition, combined with the cognitive decline compared to the previous neuropsychological evaluation [conducted elsewhere] and clinical presentation, are compatible with bvFTD. | ||||
10 | Behavioral symptoms: Loss of empathy, loss of insight |
Clinical presentation, cognitive impairment and functional decline. | Clinical 4 visits 0.8 year Neuropsychological Test results of neuropsychological evaluation conducted earlier elsewhere were available. |
Performs activities of daily living independently but has progressive difficulties operating appliances and managing finances, as reported by caregiver. |
Neuropsychological exam conducted elsewhere showed poor performance on multiple domains, particularly executive functioning and language | ||||
11 | Behavioral symptoms: Apathy, loss of empathy |
Screened for MAPT mutation when symptoms first manifested because of positive family history. Diagnosis based on mutation, clinical presentation, cognitive and functional decline. | Clinical 2 visits 1 month Neuropsychological Test results of two neuropsychological evaluations with 1.2 year interval conducted elsewhere were available. |
Increasing interference with daily functioning, as reported by caregiver. |
Neuropsychological evaluation per domain (2nd neuropsychological exam performed elsewhere): Orientation to person and place: unimpaired; to time: impaired Memory: poor Language: highly variable (unimpaired to poor) Attention: unimpaired Executive functions: below average to poor Information processing speed: below average Visuoconstructive ability: unimpaired Social cognition: poor Conclusion: compared to the previous evaluation there is a decline in orientation and language |