Table 1.
Collection information and population genetics parameters.
| Location | Year | N | Ho | He | AR* | p(SMM) | p(TPM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rabai, KE | 2006 | 31 | 0.549 | 0.721 | 5.87 | 0.14746 | 0.00244 |
| Rabai, KE | 2009 | 37 | 0.650 | 0.705 | 5.81 | 0.2334 | 0.00806 |
| Rabai, KE | 2012 | 16 | 0.627 | 0.574 | 3.76 | 0.00488 | 0.00098 |
| Goudiry, SN | 2007 | 46 | 0.600 | 0.505 | 2.69 | 0.00098 | 0.00098 |
| Goudiry, SN | 2012 | 54 | 0.498 | 0.585 | 3.53 | 0.00195 | 0.00098 |
| Lunyo, UG | 2012 | 54 | 0.656 | 0.602 | 4.34 | 0.00049 | 0.00049 |
| Lunyo, UG | 2013 | 53 | 0.577 | 0.669 | 4.75 | 0.01221 | 0.00342 |
| Cachoeiro, BR | 2008 | 23 | 0.399 | 0.404 | 3.06 | 0.32031 | 0.14746 |
| Cachoeiro, BR | 2010 | 47 | 0.510 | 0.535 | 3.16 | 0.15137 | 0.06396 |
| Cachoeiro, BR | 2012 | 47 | 0.463 | 0.495 | 3.23 | 0.09229 | 0.04248 |
| Cairns, AU | 2009 | 48 | 0.631 | 0.549 | 3.24 | 0.0061 | 0.00122 |
| Cairns, AU | 2013 | 51 | 0.581 | 0.593 | 3.53 | 0.05225 | 0.04248 |
| Yaoundé, CM | 2005 | 10 | 0.450 | 0.603 | 4.08 | 0.00098 | 0.00098 |
| Yaoundé, CM | 2009 | 47 | 0.632 | 0.639 | 4.88 | 0.20605 | 0.01611 |
| Yaoundé, CM | 2014 | 54 | 0.548 | 0.629 | 4.81 | 0.20361 | 0.06396 |
| Pijijiapan, CHP, MX | 2006 | 48 | 0.493 | 0.464 | 2.68 | 0.00049 | 0.00049 |
| Pijijiapan, CHP, MX | 2008 | 47 | 0.391 | 0.458 | 2.94 | 0.03418 | 0.0061 |
| Coatzacoalcos, VER, MX | 2003 | 35 | 0.483 | 0.464 | 3.07 | 0.00928 | 0.00928 |
| Coatzacoalcos, VER, MX | 2008 | 50 | 0.418 | 0.341 | 2.4 | 0.00684 | 0.00488 |
| Houston, TX, US | 1998 | 47 | 0.408 | 0.370 | 2.2 | 0.00049 | 0.00049 |
| Houston, TX, US | 2009 | 29 | 0.546 | 0.451 | 2.84 | 0.01221 | 0.00684 |
| Houston, TX, US | 2011 | 19 | 0.439 | 0.416 | 2.82 | 0.00684 | 0.00488 |
| New Orleans, NO, US | 2011 | 46 | 0.570 | 0.617 | 4.12 | 0.10986 | 0.0105 |
| New Orleans, NO, US | 2012 | 63 | 0.591 | 0.603 | 4.24 | 0.20361 | 0.06396 |
| Vaca Key, FL, US | 2006 | 42 | 0.589 | 0.620 | 3.96 | 0.12939 | 0.01343 |
| Vaca Key, FL, US | 2009 | 43 | 0.512 | 0.589 | 3.93 | 0.17627 | 0.00806 |
| Tucson, AZ, US | 2012 | 53 | 0.545 | 0.589 | 3.7 | 0.38037 | 0.03418 |
| Tucson, AZ, US | 2013 | 54 | 0.554 | 0.557 | 3.63 | 0.15137 | 0.10986 |
| Patillas, PR | 2012 | 54 | 0.600 | 0.594 | 4.06 | 0.0105 | 0.00464 |
| Patillas, PR | 2014 | 54 | 0.574 | 0.536 | 3.78 | 0.00488 | 0.00342 |
| Amacuzac, MOR, MX | 2012 | 54 | 0.540 | 0.546 | 3.53 | 0.17627 | 0.01343 |
| Amacuzac, MOR, MX | 2013 | 54 | 0.569 | 0.530 | 3.3 | 0.03418 | 0.0061 |
| Amacuzac, MOR, MX | 2014 | 53 | 0.560 | 0.558 | 3.51 | 0.33936 | 0.26611 |
| Mean | 0.538 | 0.549 | 3.680 |
Ho = observed heterozygosity; He = expected heterozygosity; AR = Allelic Richness estimated by rarefaction (N=20 genes), p(SMM) and p(TPM)= probability of bottleneck under the Stepwise Mutation Model or under the Two Phase Model with variance =0.36 [38]. Values in bold indicate significance after Bonferroni correction.