Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr 3;45:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.007

Table 4.

Initial model results

Level 1 covariates β Var at Level 2
 Control group (active vs. passive) .14 .06
 Supplementary school-based program (yes vs. no) −.15* .02
 Estimation (1=none, 5 = high) .03 .04
 Sample size (/1000) −.18** .00
 Retention (%) .03 .00
 At risk (Tier 2 vs. Tier 1 or mixed) −.17 .08
 Age .40** .00
 Socio-economic Status (low vs. middle or mixed) .10* .00
 Sex (% female) .18 .00
 Ethnicity (%) .03 .00

Level 2 covariates β

 Delivery mode (in-person/group-based vs. otherwise) .06 -
 Community-based program (yes vs. no) −.14 -
 Role-playing (yes vs. no) .05 -
 Booster session(s) (yes vs. no) .05 -
 Dosage (total minutes/1000) .13 -

Level 2 program codes (minutes/60) β

 1. Parental Monitoring and Behavior Management
  Parent .12 -
  Youth - -
  Whole family −.03 -
 2. Fostering School Success
  Parent .06 -
  Youth - -
  Whole family - -
 3. Positive Family Relationships
  Parent −.04 -
  Youth .49* -
  Whole family .26 -
 4. Substance Use Knowledge, Attitudes, and Values
  Parent −.05 -
  Youth .14 -
  Whole family −.11 -
 5. Self-Regulation and Stress Management
  Parent −.10 -
  Youth .16 -
  Whole family −.04 -
 6. Problem Solving
  Parent −.13 -
  Youth .41* -
  Whole family −.05 -
 7. Resisting Peer Risk
  Parent .29 -
  Youth .16 -
  Whole family −.15 -
 8. Psycho-Education
  Parent −.02 -
 9. Ethnic Identity
  Parent - -
  Youth - -
  Whole family - -
 10. Future Orientation
  Parent −.11 -
  Youth .64* -
  Whole family −.05 -

Note. Estimates were not derived for the following codes due to lack of variance (i.e., > 90% of programs had no/zero time): Parental Monitoring and Behavior Management (youth); Fostering School Success (youth and whole family); and Ethnic Identity (parent, youth, and whole family).

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.