Target |
Possible approach (selected from experimental models) |
Reference(s) |
Dampening Kupffer cell activation by influencing the gut–liver axis |
• restoration of the normal microbiome, by application of probiotics, antibiotics or fecal microbiota transfer; |
29,115,117,118 |
|
• sequestering of deoxycholic acid (or other bile acids associated formation oxidative stress and DNA damage); |
|
|
• application of compounds that lead to elevated tightness of the intestinal barrier. |
|
Inhibition of (Ly-6C+) inflammatory monocyte recruitment to the liver |
• pharmacological antagonism of CCL2 (MCP-1), e.g., by RNA aptamer molecules; |
103,120 |
|
• pharmacological inhibition of CCR2 and/or of other related chemokine receptors like CCR1/CCR5 (e.g., cenicriviroc). |
|
Modulatinghepatic macrophage polarization and function |
• nanoparticles influencing hepatic macrophage polarization; |
123,126,128,129,131,132 |
|
• Delivery of “polarizing” drugs (e.g., dexamethasone) to hepatic macrophages; |
|
|
• Neutralization of inflammatory effector cytokines like TNF and IL-1; |
|
|
• Inhibition of the pro-inflammatory mediator Galectin-3. |
|
Augmentation of restorative hepatic macrophages |
• Application of IL-4 to force local proliferation of tissue-remodeling macrophages; |
20,120,135,136 |
|
• Autologous cell transfer of in vitro matured and polarized macrophages or of hematopoietic precursors; |
|
|
• Inhibition of inflammatory monocyte influx during the regression of fibrosis; |
|
|
• Injecting apoptotic cells or PS-containing liposomes to accelerate the differentiation to Ly-6Clow macrophages. |
|