Skip to main content
. 2016 May 5;6:25247. doi: 10.1038/srep25247

Table 4. Effectiveness of prolotherapy injection by comparison type for WOMAC composite, WOMAC pain, WOMAC Function scores and pain intensity.

  Outcome: WOMAC Composite at 12–16 week
Comparison n Scale Range ^ Pre-treatment mean score Standard deviation Post-treatment adjusted mean change Standard error Duration of follow up
Dumais28 Dextrose 18 0–96 44.4 13.7 −21.8 2.95 16 week
Exercise 18 0–96 36.2 16.8 −6.1 3.28  
Rabago22 Dextrose 30 0–100 63.1 15.0 13.31 3.32 12 week
Normal saline 29 0–100 62.7 14.3 8.19 3.37  
Exercise 31 0–100 60.5 11.3 4.26 3.36  
Rabago30 Dextrose (dextrose alone or dextrose + morrhuate) 24 0–100 59.9 12.2 14.2 2.7 12 week
Control (normal saline or exercise) 13 0–100 67.0 10.8 7.0 3.4  
  Outcome: WOMAC Pain at 12–16 week
Dumais28 Dextrose 18 0–20 9.5 2.9 −5.0 0.78 16 week
Exercise 18 0–20 8.7 4.0 −1.9 0.73  
Rabago22 Dextrose 30 0–100 66.8 14.9 11.78 3.62 12 week
Normal saline 29 0–100 66.7 16.1 5.79 3.67  
Exercise 31 0–100 63.2 13.1 4.89 3.66  
Rabago30 Dextrose (dextrose alone or dextrose + morrhuate) 24 0–100 62.3 12.9 15.4 3.0 12 week
Control (normal saline or exercise) 13 0–100 71.9 13.5 3.5 3.9  
  Outcome: WOMAC Function at 12–16 week
Dumais28 Dextrose 18 0–68 33.6 10.7 −14.6 2.14 16 week
Exercise 18 0–68 26.8 12.8 −3.6 2.52  
Rabago22 Dextrose 30 0–100 65.2 15.8 14.61 3.40 12 week
Normal saline 29 0–100 67.6 17.5 6.63 3.44  
Exercise 31 0–100 61.9 12.7 4.89 3.43  
Rabago30 Dextrose (dextrose alone or dextrose + morrhuate) 24 0–100 62.6 12.9 14.3 2.8 12 week
Control (normal saline or exercise) 13 0–100 68.5 11.3 7.8 2.8  
  Outcome: pain intensity at 16–24 week (measured on a Visual Analogue scale VAS of 0–100 mm)
Dumais28# Dextrose 18 0–100 48.6 21.8 −29.70 4.57 16 week
Exercise 18 0–100 38.3 24.8 −9.92 4.58  
Reeves 2002$ Dextrose 36 0–100 21.5 22.4 −5.4 2.4 24 week
Water 35 0–100 27.3 20.2 −10.4 2.5  
Reeves 2002£ Dextrose 36 0–100 39.4 28.2 −13.9 3.1  
Water 35 0–100 38.3 22.0 −9.80 3.2  
Reeve 2002& Dextrose 36 0–100 53.3 28.0 −13.7 3.2  
Water 35 0–100 58.3 26.0 −12.3 3.2  
  Outcome: pain intensity at 16–24 week (Wong Baker/Knee pain scale)
Dumais28* Dextrose 18 WBS 0–5 2.7 1.2 −1.27 0.33 16 week
Exercise 18 WBS 0–5 2.3 1.1 −0.19 0.26  
Rabago22¥ Dextrose 43 KPS 0–5 1.8 0.8 −0.92 0.25 24 week
Normal saline 41 KPS 0–5 1.7 0.7 −0.26 0.25  
Exercise 47 KPS 0–5 1.7 0.8 −0.33 0.24  
  Outcome: WOMAC Composite at 52 week
Rabago22 Dextrose 30 0–100 63.1 15.0 15.32 3.32  
Normal saline 29 0–100 62.7 14.3 7.59 3.36  
Exercise 31 0–100 60.5 11.3 8.24 3.33  
Rabago30 Dextrose (dextrose alone or dextrose + morrhuate) 24 0–100 59.9 12.2 17.6 3.2  
Control (normal saline or exercise) 13 0–100 67.0 10.8 8.6 5.0  
  Outcome WOMAC Pain at 52 week
Rabago22 Dextrose 30 0–100 66.8 14.9 14.18 3.62  
Normal saline 29 0–100 66.7 16.1 7.38 3.67  
  Exercise 31 0–100 63.2 13.1 9.24 3.63  
Rabago30 Dextrose (dextrose alone or dextrose + morrhuate) 24 0–100 62.3 12.9 18.1 3.8  
Control (normal saline or exercise) 13 0–100 71.9 13.5 4.6 5.0  
  Outcome WOMAC function at 52 week
Rabago22 Dextrose 30 0–100 65.2 15.8 16.25 3.39  
Normal saline 29 0–100 67.6 17.5 5.46 3.44  
Exercise 31 0–100 61.9 12.7 7.31 3.40  
Rabago30 Dextrose (dextrose alone or dextrose + morrhuate) 24 0–100 62.6 12.9 18.6 2.9  
Control (normal saline or exercise) 13 0–100 68.5 11.3 9.8 4.8  

Keys:

#The VAS score in Dumais 2012 represents a global assessment of disease activity, with minus sign (−) indicating improvement.

$The VAS score in Reeves 2002 represents measurement of pain intensity at rest, with minus sign (−) indicating improvement.

£The VAS score in Reeves 2002 represents measurement of pain intensity with walking, with minus sign (−) indicating improvement.

&The VAS score in Reeves 2002 represents measurement of pain intensity with stair use, with minus sign (−) indicating improvement.

*Wong Baker = Wong Baker Faces Pain Rating scale from 0–5, with minus sign (−) indicating improvement.

¥The Knee pain scale assessed severity on a 0–5 ordinal scale on each individual knee, with minus sign (−) indicating improvement.

^Dumais adopted WOMAC version constructed on a five point Likert scale: composite (0–96), pain (0–20), stiffness (0–8) and function (0–68). Lower score indicates better knee related metrics, minus sign (−) indicates pain reduction.

^Rabago adopted WOMAC version constructed on a five point Likert scale: composite (0–96), pain (0–20), stiffness (0–8) and function (0–68); values were then converted to a 0–100 scale for each of the four domains. Composite WOMAC score reflect a weighted average. Higher score indicates better knee related metrics, of which a positive sign (+) indicates improvement.

The values in standard deviation were converted to standard error.