Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: Tex Public Health J. 2015 Spring;67(2):19–27.

Table 3.

Percent Agreement, Kappa, and Prevalence- and Bias-Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) between Seven Binary Urban-Rural Measures defined at the County, ZIP Code, Census Tract, and Block Group Levels

Comparisons by Geography and Measure % Agreement Kappa PABAK
County-County
    UI-RUCC 100
    UI-NCHS 100
    RUCC-NCHS 100
County-ZIP
    County-FAR 92.2 46.3 84.3
    County-zRUCA 95.7 81.1 91.6
County-Tract
    County-tRUCA 91.9 66.7 83.8
County-Block Group
    County-BG 81.8 19.1 63.6
ZIP-ZIP
    FAR-zRUCA 89.4 38.3 78.8
ZIP-Tract
    FAR-tRUCA 86.9 31.7 73.8
    zRUCA-tRUCA 93.0 73.1 85.9
ZIP-Block Group
    FAR-BG 83.5 8.7 66.9
    zRUCA- BG 80.5 23.3 61.0
Tract-Block Group
    tRUCA- BG 78.2 19.0 56.4
All 7 Definitions agree 72.9 54.3 -

Note: all Kappa and PABAK values are p<.0001