Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: Freshw Biol. 2015 Sep 23;61(1):110–120. doi: 10.1111/fwb.12685

Table 4.

Comparison of the 19 competing models used to explain interactions among Pseudacris regilla tadpoles, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, zooplankton, periphyton, phytoplankton and nutrients. See Fig. 5a to match letters with paths

Model Paths AICc Δ AIC ω
  1 c,e-f,i-l,n −90.44   0.00 0.75
  2 a,e-f,i-l,n −87.03   3.41 0.14
  3 a,c,e-f,i-l,n −85.32   5.12 0.06
  4 a,c,e,i-l,n −85.18   5.26 0.05
  5 a,c-f,i-l,n −79.71 10.73 0.00
  6 a-c,e-f,i-l,n −79.54 10.90 0.00
  7 a-f,i-l,n −73.23 17.21 0.00
  8 a-f,i-l −70.81 19.63 0.00
  9 a-f,i-n −67.74 22.70 0.00
10 a-f,h-l,n −67.70 22.74 0.00
11 a-f,h-n −61.23 29.21 0.00
12 a-g,i-n −60.03 30.42 0.00
13 a-l,n −59.44 31.00 0.00
14 a-h,j-n −56.31 34.13 0.00
15 a-d,f-n −55.96 34.48 0.00
16 a-j,l-n −55.59 34.85 0.00
17 a-n −51.79 38.65 0.00
18 a-i,k-n −48.24 42.20 0.00
19 a-k,m-n −14.30 76.14 0.00